1892 United States presidential election in North Dakota: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 144: Line 144:

! rowspan=”2″ |County

! rowspan=”2″ |County

! colspan=”2″ |Benjamin Harrison<br />Republican

! colspan=”2″ |Benjamin Harrison<br />Republican

! colspan=”2″ |James Baird Weaver<br />Populist/Democratic Fusion

! colspan=”2″ |<br />Democratic

! colspan=”2″ |John Bidwell<br />Prohibition

! colspan=”2″ |John Bidwell<br />Prohibition

! colspan=”2″ |Margin

! colspan=”2″ |Margin


Latest revision as of 14:14, 28 November 2025

1892 United States presidential election in North Dakota

County Results


The 1892 United States presidential election in North Dakota took place on November 8, 1892. As North Dakota had been admitted to the Union as the 39th state on November 2, 1889, this was the first presidential election in which North Dakota cast electoral votes. All contemporary 44 states were part of the 1892 United States presidential election. Voters chose three electors to the Electoral College, which selected the president and vice president.

In 1892, the North Dakota Democratic Party and People’s Party conducted a fusion ticket.[1] In North Dakota, the Fusionists’ opponents were the Republican nominees, incumbent President Benjamin Harrison of Indiana and his running mate Whitelaw Reid of New York.

As was the case in this era, voters in North Dakota chose electors individually rather than as a slate.[2] While it was a Fusion elector who earned the most votes with 17,700, the 17,519 recorded by the top Republican elector was enough to edge out the lowest vote-getting Fusion elector for third place overall. This created a split delegation of electors. Ultimately, the Fusion electors split their votes (one for Weaver and one for Democratic president-elect Grover Cleveland) while the Republican elector duly voted for the defeated incumbent Harrison.[3] This is the only time in a US presidential election that a state has equally distributed its electoral votes between three candidates. A state had only cast electoral votes for 3 different candidates twice before, in 1824 (New York cast votes for four) and 1872, the latter due to the death of Horace Greeley. Since 1892, the only time a state has cast electoral votes for more than two candidates was in 2016, when both Washington and Texas did so. However, both of those situations involved faithless electors, meaning this remains (as of 2025) the last time a state’s voters duly elected presidential electors who vote more or less as pledged for three different candidates.

County Benjamin Harrison
Republican
Fusion
Democratic and People’s
John Bidwell
Prohibition
Margin Total votes cast [5]
# % # % # % # %
Barnes 665 41.02% 918 56.63% 38 2.34% -253 -15.61% 1,621
Benson 419 68.80% 175 28.74% 15 2.46% 244 40.07% 609
Billings 47 73.44% 17 26.56% 0 0.00% 30 46.88% 64
Bottineau 175 37.15% 290 61.57% 6 1.27% -115 -24.42% 471
Burleigh 640 68.60% 283 30.33% 10 1.07% 357 38.26% 933
Cass 2,022 53.98% 1,647 43.97% 77 2.06% 375 10.01% 3,746
Cavalier 297 25.34% 855 72.95% 20 1.71% -558 -47.61% 1,172
Dickey 509 43.39% 647 55.16% 17 1.45% -138 -11.76% 1,173
Eddy 202 51.40% 184 46.82% 7 1.78% 18 4.58% 393
Emmons 278 67.48% 132 32.04% 2 0.49% 146 35.44% 412
Foster 192 54.08% 157 44.23% 6 1.69% 35 9.86% 355
Grand Forks 1,639 51.27% 1,483 46.39% 75 2.35% 156 4.88% 3,197
Griggs 245 41.88% 332 56.75% 8 1.37% -87 -14.87% 585
Kidder 224 60.87% 136 36.96% 8 2.17% 88 23.91% 368
LaMoure 338 42.62% 436 54.98% 19 2.40% -98 -12.36% 793
Logan 87 70.73% 35 28.46% 1 0.81% 52 42.28% 123
McHenry 201 64.22% 110 35.14% 2 0.64% 91 29.07% 313
McIntosh 280 70.00% 120 30.00% 0 0.00% 160 40.00% 400
McLean 115 62.84% 65 35.52% 3 1.64% 50 27.32% 183
Mercer 28 32.94% 48 56.47% 9 10.59% -20 -23.53% 85
Morton 596 60.75% 380 38.74% 5 0.51% 216 22.02% 981
Nelson 460 46.09% 527 52.81% 11 1.10% -67 -6.71% 998
Oliver 35 42.17% 48 57.83% 0 0.00% -13 -15.66% 83
Pembina 954 36.72% 1,511 58.16% 133 5.12% -557 -21.44% 2,598
Pierce 121 69.14% 53 30.29% 1 0.57% 68 38.86% 175
Ramsey 619 57.58% 421 39.16% 35 3.26% 198 18.42% 1,075
Ransom 566 49.43% 526 45.94% 53 4.63% 40 3.49% 1,145
Richland 866 42.77% 1,134 56.00% 25 1.23% -268 -13.23% 2,025
Rolette 273 57.84% 194 41.10% 5 1.06% 79 16.74% 472
Sargent 491 47.39% 525 50.68% 20 1.93% -34 -3.28% 1,036
Stark 339 60.64% 212 37.92% 8 1.43% 127 22.72% 559
Steele 398 52.65% 338 44.71% 20 2.65% 60 7.94% 756
Stutsman 648 53.91% 522 43.43% 32 2.66% 126 10.48% 1,202
Towner 166 43.68% 214 56.32% 0 0.00% -48 -12.63% 380
Traill 1,026 56.31% 668 36.66% 128 7.03% 358 19.65% 1,822
Walsh 974 31.48% 2,040 65.93% 80 2.59% -1,066 -34.45% 3,094
Ward 182 58.52% 114 36.66% 15 4.82% 68 21.86% 311
Wells 157 50.81% 147 47.57% 5 1.62% 10 3.24% 309
Williams 45 44.55% 56 55.45% 0 0.00% -11 -10.89% 101
Totals 17,519 48.50% 17,700 49.01% 899 2.49% -181 -0.50% 36,118
  1. ^ Knoles, George Harmon; The Presidential Campaign and Election of 1892 (1942), p. 185
  2. ^ Knoles; The Presidential Campaign and Election of 1892
  3. ^ “The State Electors”. The Washburn Leader. Vol. 3, no. 30. January 14, 1893. p. 1.
  4. ^ North Dakota. Legislative Manual. Bismarck, ND: Tribune, Printers and Binders. pp. 54–55.
  5. ^ North Dakota (1893). Legislative Manual. Bismarck, ND: Tribune, Printers and Binders. pp. 54–55.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top