User talk:Coconut0330: Difference between revisions

Hello, I’m Vif12vf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Progressive Action Party, but you didn’t provide a reliable source. It’s been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 18:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Law and Justice. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 14:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe these templates are already sort of exhaustive, and they represent more than just parties with “conservative”/”liberal”/”agrarian” views, but rather parties from conservative/liberal/agrarian currents. SKL and PSL already belong on their respective templates (Templates:Liberalism/Agrarianism in Poland). Polish kurd (talk) 16:13, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent categorization edit here, please note that categories need to meet verifiability criteria just as article content does. Additionally, categorization should be clearly supported by the article content. See WP:CATDEF. In the case of the categories you added in the referenced edit, this was clearly not the case for the neo-Nazi category. It could probably be argued for at least one of the other two, but it has to be more clear. ButlerBlog (talk) 17:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)\[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 02:25, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is EC gaming by Coconut0330. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 02:25, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have revoked your EC rights for gaming the system. You will need to start over making constructive edits, continued gaming will result in a block. Mfield (Oi!) 02:29, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

How much edits? Coconut0330 (talk) 13:13, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need 500 new constructive edits. 500 is the original requirement and what I usually see when EC is revoked. Toast1454_TC 15:13, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wait I need to do another 500 edits? Coconut0330 (talk) 15:17, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]