User talk:Tejas101099993: Difference between revisions

[[User:Kovcszaln6|Kovcszaln6]] ([[User talk:Kovcszaln6|talk]]) 08:49, 31 January 2026 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

[[User:Kovcszaln6|Kovcszaln6]] ([[User talk:Kovcszaln6|talk]]) 08:49, 31 January 2026 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Amha Pipra|Amha Pipra]] (January 31) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by RangersRus was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This draft’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />

* [[WP:ORGDEPTH|”in-depth”]] (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)

* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]]

* [[Wikipedia:No original research#Secondary|”secondary”]]

* [[WP:ORGIND|”strictly independent”]] of the subject <br />

Make sure you add references that meet ”all four” of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–

—

–> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it ”after they have been resolved”.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Amha Pipra]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Amha_Pipra ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RangersRus&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Amha_Pipra ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:RangersRus|RangersRus]] ([[User talk:RangersRus|talk]]) 13:37, 31 January 2026 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

Hello, Tejas101099993!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. You may benefit from following the links and tips below:

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

• Don’t be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It’s normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don’t worry if you don’t understand everything at first—it’s fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article’s talk page. Be civil, and don’t restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Thanks for your contributions to Supaul – Triveniganj railway line. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it consists of machine-generated text.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:14, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ok I will improve it. Thanks

But can i take a small help from AI Tejas101099993 (talk) 05:51, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No, please do not. And don’t resubmit the draft without first addressing the reason why it was moved to draftspace. Thank you. —bonadea contributions talk 11:46, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

bonadea contributions talk 11:44, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tejas101099993! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 11:44, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

RangersRus (talk) 11:19, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Amha Pipra. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Agent 007 (talk) 19:11, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Agent VII was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

Agent 007 (talk) 17:39, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kovcszaln6 was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:49, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

RangersRus (talk) 13:37, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]