User talk:EricDahlberg: Difference between revisions

 

Line 80: Line 80:

[[User:Jcgaylor|Jcgaylor]] ([[User talk:Jcgaylor|talk]]) 02:29, 27 January 2026 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

[[User:Jcgaylor|Jcgaylor]] ([[User talk:Jcgaylor|talk]]) 02:29, 27 January 2026 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:UW Medicine|UW Medicine]] (February 1) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Bonadea was:

{{divbox|gray|3=Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a [[large language model]], such as ChatGPT. ”’Wikipedia guidelines [[WP:NEWLLM|prohibit the use of LLMs]] to write articles from scratch.”’ In addition, LLM-generated articles [[WP:AISIGNS|usually have multiple quality issues]], to include:<br />

* [[WP:NOTPROMO|Promotional tone]], [[MOS:EDITORIAL|editorializing]] and other [[WP:WTW|words to watch]]

* [[WP:VAGUE|Vague]], generic, and [[WP:CRYSTAL|speculative statements]] extrapolated from similar subjects

* [[WP:NOTESSAY|Essay-like writing]]

* [[Hallucination (artificial intelligence)|Hallucinations]] (plausible-sounding, but false information) and [[WP:FAKE|non-existent references]]

* [[WP:Close paraphrasing|Close paraphrasing]]<br />

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See [[Wikipedia:Large language models|our help page on large language models]].|}}<!–

–> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it ”after they have been resolved”.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:UW Medicine]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:UW_Medicine ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bonadea&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:UW_Medicine ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

”[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]” <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 12:02, 1 February 2026 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
 The comment the reviewer left was:

University of Washington is not an independent source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:21, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse logo
Hello, EricDahlberg!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:21, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paul G. Ramsey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cabrils (talk) 10:13, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SounderBruce were:  The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs to be completely rewritten to comply with WP:MOS, especially to remove sections that begin with “Academic writing describing” and “Published historical accounts”.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

SounderBruce 23:27, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcgaylor was:  The comment the reviewer left was:

This subject appears to be notable, but the draft text is returning as AI generated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

Jcgaylor (talk) 02:29, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

bonadea contributions talk 12:02, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top