Talk:Gaston III, Count of Foix/GA1: Difference between revisions

Line 46: Line 46:

===Image review===

*File:Fébus 89v.jpg: the description of the source is not specific enough at Commons (for instance, the manuscript or its modern edition could be specified)

*:Linked to the English article and the French National Library scan of the book. Let me know if that is enough or if you meant something else. [[User:Snugglebuns|Snuggle]][[User talk:Snugglebuns|📫]] 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

*File:Signature Fébus.png: source is missing at Commons.

*:I haven’t been able to find an online source for the book this is from, I linked to the worldcat listing. [[User:Snugglebuns|Snuggle]][[User talk:Snugglebuns|📫]] 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

*File:Territoires Fébus Début de Règne.png: at least one reference to a reliable source is missing at Commons.

*:I’m not sure what map the uploader used to make this, I added a link to one of Tucoo-Chala’s maps that may have been used. I can make a new map if required. [[User:Snugglebuns|Snuggle]][[User talk:Snugglebuns|📫]] 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

*File:Cernoch.jpg: the source is a dead link at Commons.

*:Added an archive link [[User:Snugglebuns|Snuggle]][[User talk:Snugglebuns|📫]] 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

*File:Territoires Fébus Mort.png: at least one reference to a reliable source is missing at Commons.

*:Looking for a source for this one. [[User:Snugglebuns|Snuggle]][[User talk:Snugglebuns|📫]] 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

*File:Froissart British Library 29v.jpg: the source link is not specific at Commons.

*File:Froissart British Library 126.jpg: the source link is not specific at Commons.

*:Checked the [https://web.archive.org/web/20150319211830/http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/Viewer.aspx?ref=harley_ms_4379_fs001r wayback machine] and it looks like the image is not visible but I added a link to the catalog listing for the physical images for this one and the 29v image.

*File:Canso de Fébus.jpg: the source link is not helpful at Commons. [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 13:17, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

*:I removed this one because I couldn’t find the source and I wasn’t sold on the image in the first place. I can look for something to replace it if you think the article needs it, I personally feel that it has plenty of pictures already. [[User:Snugglebuns|Snuggle]][[User talk:Snugglebuns|📫]] 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

===Source review===

*The referencing method is somewhat difficult to follow. Would it be possible to separate the bibliographic details of each cited work from the references? This is our usual practice. [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 13:17, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

*:Done, let me know if this is satisfactory. [[User:Snugglebuns|Snuggle]][[User talk:Snugglebuns|📫]] 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

===Comments===

*I realise that the article has recently been trimmed, but at over 9,000 words it remains very long. I am confident that his life could be summarised in fewer than 8,000 words in an encyclopedic article. [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 13:17, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

*:Working on this. It has been a while since I went back through this article so I will likely be able to find more to trim this go around. Thank you. [[User:Snugglebuns|Snuggle]][[User talk:Snugglebuns|📫]] 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Snugglebuns (talk · contribs) 21:09, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Borsoka (talk · contribs) 12:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?

A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?

A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?

It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?

It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:

Pass or Fail:

File:Fébus 89v.jpg: the description of the source is not specific enough at Commons (for instance, the manuscript or its modern edition could be specified)

Linked to the English article and the French National Library scan of the book. Let me know if that is enough or if you meant something else. Snuggle 📫 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
File:Signature Fébus.png: source is missing at Commons.

I haven’t been able to find an online source for the book this is from, I linked to the worldcat listing. Snuggle 📫 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
File:Territoires Fébus Début de Règne.png: at least one reference to a reliable source is missing at Commons.

I’m not sure what map the uploader used to make this, I added a link to one of Tucoo-Chala’s maps that may have been used. I can make a new map if required. Snuggle 📫 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cernoch.jpg: the source is a dead link at Commons.

Added an archive link Snuggle 📫 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
File:Territoires Fébus Mort.png: at least one reference to a reliable source is missing at Commons.

Looking for a source for this one. Snuggle 📫 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
File:Froissart British Library 29v.jpg: the source link is not specific at Commons.
File:Froissart British Library 126.jpg: the source link is not specific at Commons.

Checked the wayback machine and it looks like the image is not visible but I added a link to the catalog listing for the physical images for this one and the 29v image.
File:Canso de Fébus.jpg: the source link is not helpful at Commons. Borsoka (talk) 13:17, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I removed this one because I couldn’t find the source and I wasn’t sold on the image in the first place. I can look for something to replace it if you think the article needs it, I personally feel that it has plenty of pictures already. Snuggle 📫 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I realise that the article has recently been trimmed, but at over 9,000 words it remains very long. I am confident that his life could be summarised in fewer than 8,000 words in an encyclopedic article. Borsoka (talk) 13:17, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Working on this. It has been a while since I went back through this article so I will likely be able to find more to trim this go around. Thank you. Snuggle 📫 21:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply