User talk:JessieLi1004eagle: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

 

Line 2: Line 2:

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Did you see my response to your email? I highlighted that you could have continued the discussion at [[Talk:CapCut#Revert]] to explain your case. Your recent addition is only sourced to first-party/non-independent sources and does not establish why listing all those AI features is [[WP:due weight|due weight]] for the article. If a reader wants to know every AI feature the app offers, they can just click on the capcut.com external link in the information box at the right and explore the website. [[User:ObserveOwl|ObserveOwl]] ([[User talk:ObserveOwl#top|talk]]) 03:30, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Did you see my response to your email? I highlighted that you could have continued the discussion at [[Talk:CapCut#Revert]] to explain your case. Your recent addition is only sourced to first-party/non-independent sources and does not establish why listing all those AI features is [[WP:due weight|due weight]] for the article. If a reader wants to know every AI feature the app offers, they can just click on the capcut.com external link in the information box at the right and explore the website. [[User:ObserveOwl|ObserveOwl]] ([[User talk:ObserveOwl#top|talk]]) 03:30, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

== February 2026 ==

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I’m [[User:Bailmoney27|Bailmoney27]]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of [[Special:Contributions/JessieLi1004eagle|your recent contributions]]&nbsp;to [[:CapCut]] have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion|Advertising]] and using Wikipedia as a “[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox|soapbox]]” are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using [[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent sources]], and from a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral perspective]]. Take a look at the [[Help:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.[[Category:User talk pages with Uw-advert1 notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!– Template:uw-advert1 –> [[User:Bailmoney27|<b style=”color:black”>”Bailmoney27”</b>]] [[User talk:Bailmoney27|<b style=”color:green”><sup>talk</sup></b>]] 03:28, 7 February 2026 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 03:28, 7 February 2026

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Did you see my response to your email? I highlighted that you could have continued the discussion at Talk:CapCut#Revert to explain your case. Your recent addition is only sourced to first-party/non-independent sources and does not establish why listing all those AI features is due weight for the article. If a reader wants to know every AI feature the app offers, they can just click on the capcut.com external link in the information box at the right and explore the website. ObserveOwl (talk) 03:30, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I’m Bailmoney27. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to CapCut have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a “soapbox” are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Bailmoney27 talk 03:28, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top