From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|
{{od}} |
{{od}} |
||
|
I have taken the time to find sources for the {{cn}} tags. I have removed claims that do have reliable sources to verify that information. This should be good now. [[User:11WB|<span style=”color:#8C6A31; “>11WB</span>]] ([[User talk:11WB|talk]]) 11:22, 8 February 2026 (UTC) |
I have taken the time to find sources for the {{cn}} tags. I have removed claims that do have reliable sources to verify that information. This should be good now. [[User:11WB|<span style=”color:#8C6A31; “>11WB</span>]] ([[User talk:11WB|talk]]) 11:22, 8 February 2026 (UTC) |
||
|
*”’Keep”’. Concerns resolved. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 14:48, 8 February 2026 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 14:48, 8 February 2026
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
Lots of “citation needed” templates from February 2023. Z1720 (talk) 03:32, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Z1720: As far as I can tell, most of those seem to have been put in place of the citations that were there before, see the diff. Apparently Angeldeb82 removed the previous source
- Woger, Martin (2009-12-23). “Venetica”. Eurogamer.de (in German). Retrieved 2019-08-25.
- and replaced it with the CN templates. I could just restore the source but I’d like to hear her explanation first. Regards SoWhy 19:37, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
- Well, I thought that Eurogamer only applies to the English version of the website, as described under Template:Video game reviews. Angeldeb82 (talk) 21:12, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Angeldeb82: I’m not aware of any policy or guideline that limits the reviews box to English-language reviews only. However, that doesn’t explain removing it as a source completely, unless you think it’s not a WP:RS? If so, I’d ask for some more explanation as to why. Regards SoWhy 16:12, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- Chiming in on the Eurogamer.de source. The edits seem to have been good faith and simply a misunderstanding. Eurogamer.de is a regional sister site of the English language version (Eurogamer.net).[1][2] They have an editorial policy like the English language site. I think the citations can be restored, and if there are no other issues, the GAR can be closed. My two cents.¢¢ (Guyinblack25 talk 16:11, 3 February 2026 (UTC))
- I also think Eurogamer.de can be restored. The “citation needed” templates would need to be resolved before I could recommend closing this as a keep. Z1720 (talk) 16:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Chiming in on the Eurogamer.de source. The edits seem to have been good faith and simply a misunderstanding. Eurogamer.de is a regional sister site of the English language version (Eurogamer.net).[1][2] They have an editorial policy like the English language site. I think the citations can be restored, and if there are no other issues, the GAR can be closed. My two cents.¢¢ (Guyinblack25 talk 16:11, 3 February 2026 (UTC))
- @Angeldeb82: I’m not aware of any policy or guideline that limits the reviews box to English-language reviews only. However, that doesn’t explain removing it as a source completely, unless you think it’s not a WP:RS? If so, I’d ask for some more explanation as to why. Regards SoWhy 16:12, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- Well, I thought that Eurogamer only applies to the English version of the website, as described under Template:Video game reviews. Angeldeb82 (talk) 21:12, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
I have taken the time to find sources for the [citation needed] tags. I have removed claims that do have reliable sources to verify that information. This should be good now. 11WB (talk) 11:22, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
