User talk:~2026-78471-2: Difference between revisions

Line 43: Line 43:

…(and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tora-Con&diff=prev&oldid=1337615791 this blanking] counts), you are required to identify yourself as doing so. [[User:BusterD|BusterD]] ([[User talk:BusterD|talk]]) 15:24, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Anant Sahai|Anant Sahai]] (February 11) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reasons left by WeirdNAnnoyed were:

{{divbox|gray|3=Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a [[large language model]], such as ChatGPT. ”’Wikipedia guidelines [[WP:NEWLLM|prohibit the use of LLMs]] to write articles from scratch.”’ In addition, LLM-generated articles [[WP:AISIGNS|usually have multiple quality issues]], to include:<br />

* [[WP:NOTPROMO|Promotional tone]], [[MOS:EDITORIAL|editorializing]] and other [[WP:WTW|words to watch]]

* [[WP:VAGUE|Vague]], generic, and [[WP:CRYSTAL|speculative statements]] extrapolated from similar subjects

* [[WP:NOTESSAY|Essay-like writing]]

* [[Hallucination (artificial intelligence)|Hallucinations]] (plausible-sounding, but false information) and [[WP:FAKE|non-existent references]]

* [[WP:Close paraphrasing|Close paraphrasing]]<br />

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See [[Wikipedia:Large language models|our help page on large language models]].|}}<!–

–>{{divbox|gray|3=This submission does not appear to be written in [[Wikipedia:Writing better articles#Information style and tone|the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article]]. Entries should be written from a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], and should refer to a range of [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|independent, reliable, published sources]]. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Puffery|peacock terms]] that promote the subject.|}}<!–

—

–> The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=This article is close to being ready for WP, but I think it has just slightly too promotional a tone for us (“notable contributions”, “among the first”). I also suspect this article is at least partially AI-generated, based on the promotional tone, the formatting of the sections, and some misinterpretations of the cited sources (for example, Ref. 4 is cited for the claim that he credits his two years in India with developing his work ethic, but if you read the article, it’s actually his mother that made this claim). ”Please” go through all sources and make sure they actually verify what they’re cited for, if an LLM was used. But I agree this professor is notable and the sources are reasonably good quality.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it ”after they have been resolved”.

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Anant Sahai]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Anant_Sahai ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WeirdNAnnoyed&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Anant_Sahai ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 12:09, 11 February 2026 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

{| style=”margin: 0.4em 2em;”

|- style=”vertical-align: top;”

| [[File:WP teahouse logo 2.png|alt=Teahouse logo]]

| <div style=”background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;”>Hello, ”’~2026-78471-2”’!

Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the ”'[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk|Articles for creation help desk]]”’. If you have any ”other” questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the ”'[[Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]]”’, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 12:09, 11 February 2026 (UTC)</div>

|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>

[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Naoki Higashida, which you proposed for deletion. I’m leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! FactOrOpinion (talk) 16:20, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Kavita Oberoi, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 02:36, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you’ve added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Amit Sahai

added a link pointing to ICPC

Avideh Zakhor

added a link pointing to Energy efficiency

Ceriporia albomellea

added a link pointing to Pore

Coșei

added a link pointing to Codru

Mendicants of the Roman Campagna

added a link pointing to John Sheepshanks

Phil of the Future

added a link pointing to Megalomania

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 20:03, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ~2026-78471-2, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ido Kedar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:43, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you’d added text to a comment of yours after others had responded. I encourage you to read WP:REDACT re: doing this and marking the insertion. FactOrOpinion (talk) 15:59, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, maybe I was trying to clarify something and got lazy. Please point me to the specific diff so I can fix this. ~2026-78471-2 (talk) 16:05, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Here’s a link (second paragraph). FactOrOpinion (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed that, thanks. Though at least the fundamental context was the same. ~2026-78471-2 (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Given your concerns raised at Talk:Tora-Con#Notability concerns – sourcing does not establish WP:GNG, I wanted to let you know that there is now an AFD discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tora-Con. There appeared to be technical issues with the log before. Anyhow, feel free to participate there if you want. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 14:34, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

…(and this blanking counts), you are required to identify yourself as doing so. BusterD (talk) 15:24, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by WeirdNAnnoyed were: The comment the reviewer left was:

This article is close to being ready for WP, but I think it has just slightly too promotional a tone for us (“notable contributions”, “among the first”). I also suspect this article is at least partially AI-generated, based on the promotional tone, the formatting of the sections, and some misinterpretations of the cited sources (for example, Ref. 4 is cited for the claim that he credits his two years in India with developing his work ethic, but if you read the article, it’s actually his mother that made this claim). Please go through all sources and make sure they actually verify what they’re cited for, if an LLM was used. But I agree this professor is notable and the sources are reasonably good quality.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:09, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ~2026-78471-2!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:09, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply