User talk:Jupmanmik: Difference between revisions

Line 65: Line 65:

== Blocked as a sockpuppet ==

<div class=”user-block” style=”padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(–border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px”>[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style=”margin-left:45px”>You have been ”'[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]”’ ”'[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]”’ from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|abusing multiple accounts]] as a sockpuppet of {{no ping|1=Wanaimanofficial|label1=User:Wanaimanofficial}} per the evidence presented at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wanaimanofficial]]. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but ”’not for ”[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]” reasons”’, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Edits by and on behalf of banned editors|reverted]] or [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G5|deleted]]. </div><div style=”margin-left:45px”>If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia’s [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!– Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. –><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>.  [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 15:09, 30 September 2025 (UTC)</div></div><!– Template:uw-sockblock –>

:{{unblock|reason=I would like to request that this block be unblocked. I do not know or have any connection to the account User:Wanaimanofficial and have never used any other account to circumvent restrictions or manipulate edits. All my contributions will be made legally and in accordance with Wikipedia rules. Thank you for your consideration. [[User:Jupmanmik|Jupmanmik]] ([[User talk:Jupmanmik#top|talk]]) 15:38, 30 September 2025 (UTC)}} [[User:Jupmanmik|Jupmanmik]] ([[User talk:Jupmanmik#top|talk]]) 15:38, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

:{{unblock|reason=I would like to request that this block be unblocked. I am not using another account to circumvent restrictions or manipulate edits. All my contributions will be made legally and in accordance with Wikipedia’s rules. I promise not to create any additional accounts for purposes that violate Wikipedia’s policies. Thank you for your consideration. [[User:Jupmanmik|Jupmanmik]] ([[User talk:Jupmanmik#top|talk]]) 15:35, 30 September 2025 (UTC)}} [[User:Jupmanmik|Jupmanmik]] ([[User talk:Jupmanmik#top|talk]]) 15:35, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I’m Augmented Seventh. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Augmented Seventh (talk) 05:21, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Chirag Vohra. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 08:47, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Wikishovel (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Wikishovel (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Wikishovel (talk) 08:50, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jupmanmik!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wikishovel (talk) 08:50, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Jupmanmik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to request that this block be unblocked. I do not know or have any connection to the account User:Wanaimanofficial and have never used any other account to circumvent restrictions or manipulate edits. All my contributions will be made legally and in accordance with Wikipedia rules. Thank you for your consideration. Jupmanmik (talk) 15:38, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I would like to request that this block be unblocked. I do not know or have any connection to the account User:Wanaimanofficial and have never used any other account to circumvent restrictions or manipulate edits. All my contributions will be made legally and in accordance with Wikipedia rules. Thank you for your consideration. [[User:Jupmanmik|Jupmanmik]] ([[User talk:Jupmanmik#top|talk]]) 15:38, 30 September 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to request that this block be unblocked. I do not know or have any connection to the account User:Wanaimanofficial and have never used any other account to circumvent restrictions or manipulate edits. All my contributions will be made legally and in accordance with Wikipedia rules. Thank you for your consideration. [[User:Jupmanmik|Jupmanmik]] ([[User talk:Jupmanmik#top|talk]]) 15:38, 30 September 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to request that this block be unblocked. I do not know or have any connection to the account User:Wanaimanofficial and have never used any other account to circumvent restrictions or manipulate edits. All my contributions will be made legally and in accordance with Wikipedia rules. Thank you for your consideration. [[User:Jupmanmik|Jupmanmik]] ([[User talk:Jupmanmik#top|talk]]) 15:38, 30 September 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Jupmanmik (talk) 15:38, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Jupmanmik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to request that this block be unblocked. I am not using another account to circumvent restrictions or manipulate edits. All my contributions will be made legally and in accordance with Wikipedia’s rules. I promise not to create any additional accounts for purposes that violate Wikipedia’s policies. Thank you for your consideration. Jupmanmik (talk) 15:35, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I would like to request that this block be unblocked. I am not using another account to circumvent restrictions or manipulate edits. All my contributions will be made legally and in accordance with Wikipedia's rules. I promise not to create any additional accounts for purposes that violate Wikipedia's policies. Thank you for your consideration. [[User:Jupmanmik|Jupmanmik]] ([[User talk:Jupmanmik#top|talk]]) 15:35, 30 September 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to request that this block be unblocked. I am not using another account to circumvent restrictions or manipulate edits. All my contributions will be made legally and in accordance with Wikipedia's rules. I promise not to create any additional accounts for purposes that violate Wikipedia's policies. Thank you for your consideration. [[User:Jupmanmik|Jupmanmik]] ([[User talk:Jupmanmik#top|talk]]) 15:35, 30 September 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to request that this block be unblocked. I am not using another account to circumvent restrictions or manipulate edits. All my contributions will be made legally and in accordance with Wikipedia's rules. I promise not to create any additional accounts for purposes that violate Wikipedia's policies. Thank you for your consideration. [[User:Jupmanmik|Jupmanmik]] ([[User talk:Jupmanmik#top|talk]]) 15:35, 30 September 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Jupmanmik (talk) 15:35, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply