From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|
:*”’Delete”’ or maybe redirect back to the disambiguation page as there are multiple treatments that have been called “shock therapy” in the past. This article does seem to be synthesized as stated. (for reference, about 80% of the text in this article was added in one go in March 2024, hence the concern about LLMs). [[User:Anonrfjwhuikdzz|Anonrfjwhuikdzz]] ([[User talk:Anonrfjwhuikdzz|talk]]) 00:24, 30 September 2025 (UTC) |
:*”’Delete”’ or maybe redirect back to the disambiguation page as there are multiple treatments that have been called “shock therapy” in the past. This article does seem to be synthesized as stated. (for reference, about 80% of the text in this article was added in one go in March 2024, hence the concern about LLMs). [[User:Anonrfjwhuikdzz|Anonrfjwhuikdzz]] ([[User talk:Anonrfjwhuikdzz|talk]]) 00:24, 30 September 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:”’Delete”’. This belongs as part of [[electro-convulsive therapy]]. [[User:Tangurena|Tangurena]] ([[User talk:Tangurena|talk]]) 17:29, 30 September 2025 (UTC) |
:”’Delete”’. This belongs as part of [[electro-convulsive therapy]]. [[User:Tangurena|Tangurena]] ([[User talk:Tangurena|talk]]) 17:29, 30 September 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:”’Keep”’, and manage problems with normal editing practices, such as deletion. This clearly not a subset of [[electro-convulsive therapy]], given the inclusion of chemical and other methods that have been used, such as [[Insulin shock therapy]], so a merge to that target is inappropriate. It is also identified is as a coherent topic in other encyclopedias (such as [https://www.britannica.com/science/shock-therapy-psychiatry britannica]]), and is treated as a coherent topic in peer-reviewed research, including cardiazol shock therpay,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kragh |first1=Jesper Vaczy |title=Shock Therapy in Danish Psychiatry |journal=Medical History |date=July 2010 |volume=54 |issue=3 |pages=341–364 |doi=10.1017/s0025727300004646}}</ref> and other forms of chemical shock therapy.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Peters |first1=Uwe |title=Die Einführung der Schockbehandlungen und die psychiatrische Emigration |journal=Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie |date=September 1992 |volume=60 |issue=09 |pages=356–365 |doi=10.1055/s-2007-999155}}</ref> So I suggest keeping the topic, trimming to cover only chemical methods (which, with the exception of insulin aren’t covered elsewhere), and adding a hatnote to describe the scope article (excluding [[electro-convulsive therapy]]). Feel free to ping me to help with a tidy-up if there is a decision to keep. [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 19:46, 30 September 2025 (UTC) |
|||
|
{{reflist talk}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 19:46, 30 September 2025
- Shock therapy (psychiatry) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page is full of WP:SYNTH. A listing of several psychiatric techniques (all of which, apart from electro-convulsive therapy, have been discontinued) that have loosely been called “shock therapy” of some sort, without any single source linking them together. We have Shock therapy (disambiguation) which already accounts for everything in this article. Much of the text is likely LLM-generated, to add insult to injury, though the page long precedes current LLMs. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:22, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
-
- Delete or maybe redirect back to the disambiguation page as there are multiple treatments that have been called “shock therapy” in the past. This article does seem to be synthesized as stated. (for reference, about 80% of the text in this article was added in one go in March 2024, hence the concern about LLMs). Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 00:24, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. This belongs as part of electro-convulsive therapy. Tangurena (talk) 17:29, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
- Keep, and manage problems with normal editing practices, such as deletion. This clearly not a subset of electro-convulsive therapy, given the inclusion of chemical and other methods that have been used, such as Insulin shock therapy, so a merge to that target is inappropriate. It is also identified is as a coherent topic in other encyclopedias (such as britannica]), and is treated as a coherent topic in peer-reviewed research, including cardiazol shock therpay,[1] and other forms of chemical shock therapy.[2] So I suggest keeping the topic, trimming to cover only chemical methods (which, with the exception of insulin aren’t covered elsewhere), and adding a hatnote to describe the scope article (excluding electro-convulsive therapy). Feel free to ping me to help with a tidy-up if there is a decision to keep. Klbrain (talk) 19:46, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
References
- ^ Kragh, Jesper Vaczy (July 2010). “Shock Therapy in Danish Psychiatry”. Medical History. 54 (3): 341–364. doi:10.1017/s0025727300004646.
- ^ Peters, Uwe (September 1992). “Die Einführung der Schockbehandlungen und die psychiatrische Emigration”. Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie. 60 (09): 356–365. doi:10.1055/s-2007-999155.


