Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Harmondsworth Great Barn/1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 3: Line 3:

: {{al|Harmondsworth Great Barn|noname=yes}} • <span class=”plainlinksneverexpand”>[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Harmondsworth_Great_Barn/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]</span> • [[Talk:Harmondsworth Great Barn/GA1|Most recent review]]

: {{al|Harmondsworth Great Barn|noname=yes}} • <span class=”plainlinksneverexpand”>[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Harmondsworth_Great_Barn/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]</span> • [[Talk:Harmondsworth Great Barn/GA1|Most recent review]]

: {{GAR/current}}<br/>

: {{GAR/current}}<br/>

How was this article promoted in the first place with a bunch of citations missing urls? This article should mention what will happen to the barn with the Heathrow expansion, this is completely outdated.

How was this article promoted in the first place with a bunch of citations missing urls? This article should mention what will happen to the barn with the Heathrow expansion, this is completely outdated.

* ”’Keep”’: I’ve gone through the article, removing materials cited to those untraceable sources, and adding some new details from Historic England and English Heritage. I’ve tidied several refs and done a bit of copy-editing for tone. There was exactly one seemingly uncited statement, which I’ve removed. Mentioning the future is always a bit of a doubtful proposition, but I’ve added a mention of the Airports Commission findings about Heathrow expansion’s effect on the Great Barn. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 13:57, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

* ”’Keep”’: I’ve gone through the article, removing materials cited to those untraceable sources, and adding some new details from Historic England and English Heritage. I’ve tidied several refs and done a bit of copy-editing for tone. There was exactly one seemingly uncited statement, which I’ve removed. Mentioning the future is always a bit of a doubtful proposition, but I’ve added a mention of the Airports Commission findings about Heathrow expansion’s effect on the Great Barn. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 13:57, 4 October 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 13:59, 4 October 2025

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result pending

How was this article promoted in the first place with a bunch of citations missing urls? This article should mention what will happen to the barn with the Heathrow expansion, this is completely outdated. Yilku1 (talk) 04:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: I’ve gone through the article, removing materials cited to those untraceable sources, and adding some new details from Historic England and English Heritage. I’ve tidied several refs and done a bit of copy-editing for tone. There was exactly one seemingly uncited statement, which I’ve removed. Mentioning the future is always a bit of a doubtful proposition, but I’ve added a mention of the Airports Commission findings about Heathrow expansion’s effect on the Great Barn. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:57, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top