From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|
* ”’Keep”’: A quick look shows this article meets [[WP:GNG]] / [[WP:NORG]] and do have independent coverage. But, it seems the article needs some cleanup… [[User:Asteramellus|Asteramellus]] ([[User talk:Asteramellus|talk]]) 02:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC) <!–VCB Asteramellus–> |
* ”’Keep”’: A quick look shows this article meets [[WP:GNG]] / [[WP:NORG]] and do have independent coverage. But, it seems the article needs some cleanup… [[User:Asteramellus|Asteramellus]] ([[User talk:Asteramellus|talk]]) 02:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC) <!–VCB Asteramellus–> |
||
|
:<div class=”xfd_relist” style=”margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;”><span style=”color: #FF6600;”>”'{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}”'</span><br />”’Relisting comment:”’ Participants are divided between those arguing to Keep and those advocating Deletion. Would anyone be up for creating a source assessment table?<br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style=”font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;”>[[User:Liz|””’L””’iz]]</span> <sup style=”font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;”>[[Special:Contributions/Liz|””’Read!””’]] [[User talk:Liz|””’Talk!””’]]</sup> 04:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)</small><!– from Template:XfD relist –><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Japan Theravada Buddhist Association]]</noinclude></div> |
:<div class=”xfd_relist” style=”margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;”><span style=”color: #FF6600;”>”'{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}”'</span><br />”’Relisting comment:”’ Participants are divided between those arguing to Keep and those advocating Deletion. Would anyone be up for creating a source assessment table?<br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style=”font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;”>[[User:Liz|””’L””’iz]]</span> <sup style=”font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;”>[[Special:Contributions/Liz|””’Read!””’]] [[User talk:Liz|””’Talk!””’]]</sup> 04:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)</small><!– from Template:XfD relist –><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Japan Theravada Buddhist Association]]</noinclude></div> |
||
|
*”’Keep”’. The article has entirely too many non-primary sources to just dismiss them with a plain “not reliable” and no further source analysis. [[User:Cortador|Cortador]] ([[User talk:Cortador|talk]]) 06:34, 12 October 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 06:34, 12 October 2025
- Japan Theravada Buddhist Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable religious organization. Most sources linked are primary, the rest are dubiously reliable at best. Shocksingularity (talk) 04:00, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, Buddhism, and Japan. I am bad at usernames (talk | contribs) 04:02, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:11, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – lacks reliable sources, secondary sources. All the sources I could find that give SIGCOV are non-independent and self-published. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 11:55, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- I have added historical info and secondary sources from other Buddhist temples that are affiliated with the Japan Theravada Buddhist Association along with historical information on Theravada Buddhism and early Nikaya Buddhism and its development in Japan. Lamp21 (talk) 19:29, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Not independent sources. Have any Japanese news articles reported on this topic? 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 22:22, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Japanese news articles are often deleted from online after a short period of time, making it extraordinarily difficult to find coverage.
- There is academic study of the topic, Avery Morrow seems to be the expert in the English language literature ([1], another article by him is already cited in the article). He cites a study of the group in Japanese – an article by Naoko Takashi from 2006, published in an academic journal. I also found this article [2] discussing the founder of the organization in some detail. There is also another detailed academic treatment of the organization in the book “Globalizing Asian Religions”, chapter 9; “The Propogation of Thai Theravada Buddhism Overseas”, by Hidetake Yano. Reading through this chapter, I found he was building on his previous research on Theravada Buddhism in Japan in Japanese language research (he cites 3 previous research papers or book chapters). According to the chapter, the Japan Theravada Buddhist Association is the main sect of Theravada Buddhism in Japan in contrast to the relative failure of the Dhammakaya Temple movement to take root in Japanese Buddhism.
- On the Japanese language version of the article for Arabomulle Sumanasara, I also find a newspaper cited Weekly Asahi, seemingly about Theravada Buddhism in Japan.
- On the summation of these academic sources regarding the organization, I think there is sufficient significant independent coverage to keep the article. Katzrockso (talk) 23:32, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Not independent sources. Have any Japanese news articles reported on this topic? 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 22:22, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- I have added historical info and secondary sources from other Buddhist temples that are affiliated with the Japan Theravada Buddhist Association along with historical information on Theravada Buddhism and early Nikaya Buddhism and its development in Japan. Lamp21 (talk) 19:29, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: A quick look shows this article meets WP:GNG / WP:NORG and do have independent coverage. But, it seems the article needs some cleanup… Asteramellus (talk) 02:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Participants are divided between those arguing to Keep and those advocating Deletion. Would anyone be up for creating a source assessment table?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)


