Talk:Modulightor Building/GA1: Difference between revisions

 

Line 7: Line 7:

”’Reviewer:”’ [[User:Sammi Brie|Sammi Brie]] ([[User talk:Sammi Brie|talk]] ”’·”’ [[Special:Contributions/Sammi Brie|contribs]]) 18:05, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

”’Reviewer:”’ [[User:Sammi Brie|Sammi Brie]] ([[User talk:Sammi Brie|talk]] ”’·”’ [[Special:Contributions/Sammi Brie|contribs]]) 18:05, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

{| class=”wikitable” style=”width: 100%; width:50em”

<!–{{Subst:GABox|1a= |1b= |2a= |2b= |2c= |2d= |3a= |3b= |4= |5= |6a= |6b= |7= }}–>

|-

! height=50 | [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review<br>{{small|(see [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|here]] for what the criteria are, and [[WP:GACN|here]] for what they are not)}}

|-

|

#It is ”’reasonably well written”’.

#:a ”(prose, spelling, and grammar)”: {{GAList/check|y}}<br/> b ”([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|word choice]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|lists]])”: {{GAList/check|y}}

#It is ”’factually accurate”’ and ”'[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]”’, as shown by a [[WP:GAN/I#R3|source spot-check]].

#:a ”(references)”: {{GAList/check|y}} <br/>b ”(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])”: {{GAList/check|y}} <br/>c ”([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])”: {{GAList/check|hold}} <br/>d ”([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])”: {{GAList/check|y}}

#It is ”’broad in its coverage”’.

#:a ”(major aspects)”: {{GAList/check|y}} <br/>b ”(focused)”: {{GAList/check|y}}

#It follows the ”'[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy”’.

#:”Fair representation without bias”: {{GAList/check|y}}

#It is ”’stable”’.

#:”No edit wars, etc.”: {{GAList/check|y}}

#It is illustrated by ”'[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]”’, where possible and appropriate.

#:a ”(images are tagged and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Non-free_use_rationale_guideline|fair use rationales]])”: {{GAList/check|y}} <br/>b ”(appropriate use with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]])”: {{GAList/check|y}}

|-

| style=”text-align:center;” |

”’Overall”’:<br/>

”Pass/Fail”: {{GAList/check|hold}}<!– Template:GAReview –>

|-

|-

! height=30|[[File:Symbol_support_vote.svg|15px]] · [[File:Symbol_oppose_vote.svg|15px]] · [[File:Symbol_wait.svg|15px]] · [[File:Symbol_neutral_vote.svg|15px]]

|-

|}

{{ping|Epicgenius}} One last issue to fix. When it’s done, ping me and I will promote. [[User:Sammi Brie|<span style=”color:#ba4168″>Sammi Brie</span>]] (she/her · [[User talk:Sammi Brie|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Sammi Brie|c]]) 22:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

{{teal|”’Did you know?”’ If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.}}

{{teal|”’Did you know?”’ If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.}}

Line 21: Line 48:

===Sourcing and spot checks===

===Sourcing and spot checks===

Reviewing: 10, 18, 26, 31, 47, 54, 56

* I can’t seem to view 10 in full, but it does mention Ellsworth & Goldie, Ltd.

*

* I think “and was seriously ill by 1996.” is cited to the wrong page, as it’s not on the specified page, but I do see it elsewhere in that report.

*

*

*

*

===Images===

===Images===

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 19:11, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 18:05, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

@Epicgenius: One last issue to fix. When it’s done, ping me and I will promote. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 22:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Lead

• The building’s facade, and the interior of the third- and fourth-story duplex (formerly occupied by Rudolph’s partner Ernst Wagner), Don’t know if either comma is merited.
• which were rented in 1996 to MTV founder John Lack and his daughter in 1996 choose one “in 1996”

History

• It has seen commercial and residential uses, and later housed a gallery on its top floors. CinS

Thanks Sammi. I’ve done all of these. – Epicgenius (talk) 21:52, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing: 10, 18, 26, 31, 47, 54, 56

• I can’t seem to view 10 in full, but it does mention Ellsworth & Goldie, Ltd.
• I think “and was seriously ill by 1996.” is cited to the wrong page, as it’s not on the specified page, but I do see it elsewhere in that report.

All the images are appropriately licensed. The one in the infobox is missing alt text but that’s it.