Wikipedia talk:Asian Month: Difference between revisions

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia

How does http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/pcsj/rkpc/5rp/html/append7.htm the following:
城鎮 人口?

Kind regards Sarcelles (talk) 10:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Soory, I meant the following: How does the source given above define the following:城鎮? Sarcelles (talk) 23:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sarcelles please use <ref>{{cite web |title=关于统计上划分城乡的规定 |url=http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/pcsj/rkpc/5rp/html/append7.htm |website=www.stats.gov.cn}}</ref> like this. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 12:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ZI Jony:

township area of ​​an approved established town. Including: towns and districts of organized towns where the people’s governments and administrative offices of counties and above (excluding cities) are located, and towns and districts of other organized towns. Township refers to: (1) The seat of the town peoples government and other neighborhood committee areas under the jurisdiction of the town; (2) The urban construction of the town people’s government seat has been extended to the surrounding village committee seats, and its town area should also include the entire area of ​​the village committee.

?

Where can I read, which neighborhood committees belong to the cities as mentiobned above? Sarcelles (talk) 08:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_China#Definitions_of_Chinese_cities_in_the_narrowest_sense_(城鎮) Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 07:28, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think, given that it’s Asian Month for November, it would make the most sense if I run a contest in support in the vein of Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The European Destubathon. I would like to include Oceania in the contest given that it would be unlikely to have its own regional contest, but editors contributing to this could focus on contributing Asian articles. I am thinking of allowing both destubs/article improvements and new articles for this, given that Asian Month is about both article improvements and creations, and have long wanted to run something which also supports new articles. That would keep things varied and interesting, rather than solely doing destubathons every time.

Unlike the European and World destubathons though, with this we would likely give daily prizes, particularly for the fields of STEM and real world places and have some smaller general prizes. OKA can put up $2500 for it, but given that WMUK won’t likely be involved, I would need somebody to receive the grant money and help giving out in prizes. The prizes wouldn’t be given out until the end and would be Amazon vouchers by default unless the recipient has a valid reason why this is unacceptable. Pinging some of the regulars from past contests @Sturmvogel 66:, @SuperJew:, @Magentic Manifestations:, @BeanieFan11:, @Stevie fae Scotland:, @The C of E:, Secretlondon, Guerreroast, Chongkian etc and seeing what people think, as well as input from the Asian Month organizers and regulars. I will have to get a move on with the preparation and invitations soon if people are up for it, if not, I would likely wait until February for the World Destubathon II. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I support it, though I wouldn’t contribute much – if at all – because I’ve never really been an contributor to Asian articles. I do have some Asian elephants in my forever-expanding ‘to create’ list which I could do, but unless I fetch more of them, that’ll run out quickly. Later note: I support the World Destubathon II above this. Roast (talk) 15:27, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that if its going to be similar to the European one, I’ll be up for it. I like the idea of daily prizes too. I can’t say I know much about the region outside of historical references but I’ll give it a go. I think if you’re doing new articles too (which I fully back), you need to have something like a minimum prose requirement in place to ensure people don’t just churn out stubs. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 16:48, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think new articles would have to be no less than 1200 or even 1500 bytes, ideally no new stubs or at least meaty new ones. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:43, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld, I would support this, as there is a plethora of Asian articles which require destubbing. As suggested earlier, if we are going to have countries/geographies, we need to probably have countries plus larger subdivisions of large countries (China, Australia, India, Indonesia etc.). Last time, we had much smaller entities during the world destubathon, which did not have many articles as such. The idea of doling out daily prizes is a good one, which would probably reward people who are able to contribute only in spurts, and still do meaningful additions. One more suggestion is on the distribution of prizes (particularly as WMUK is not going to be involved). While Amazon vouchers are a good and preferable way, it has run into issues in the past as Amazon does not allow vouchers for a specific country to be procured using an international card (at least for my country!). So would probably need look at third party agents (used by Wikimedia for certain other prizes) or some other way to dole out the same. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 03:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I love it 🙂 I have plenty on my to-do list for Australia 😉 I’ll have to decide if to narrow focus on that or try to broaden as I did with the Europe and World contests —SuperJew (talk) 18:34, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]