User talk:VeritasScriptor1: Difference between revisions

Line 72: Line 72:

I’ve read Wikipedia’s guidelines and I’m ready to contribute constructively and follow all policies. [[User:VeritasScriptor1|VeritasScriptor1]] ([[User talk:VeritasScriptor1#top|talk]]) 07:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

:I’m not saying you ”are” AI, I’m saying you ”used” AI to compose your appeal. The main reason we don’t accept AI-generated appeals is that when you say “I understand X” and “I confirm Y”, we have no confidence that you actually do, if you’re just copypasting what AI told you to write. That’s why we want you, the ”person”, to tell us in your own words.

:You also need to address clearly each of the points in the block notice above, not just make sweeping general statements like {{tq|”I’m ready to […] follow all policies”}}. — [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 08:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation’s Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Laila bin hareb al mheiri on behalf of VeritasScriptor1 for their contributions to Wikipedia.

Hello, VeritasScriptor1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:VeritasScriptor1/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia’s content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! QuicoleJR (talk) 14:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:VeritasScriptor1/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:VeritasScriptor1/Draft:Laila Bin Hareb Almheiri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Hello, VeritasScriptor1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation‘s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:09, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation’s Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Jimfbleak – talk to me? 12:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|1=Hello, I uploaded the image “Laila pic1 (1).jpg” because I received it directly from Dr. Laila Hareb Al Mhieiri herself. I now understand the copyright requirements and have requested that she send permission to permissions@wikimedia.org under a free license (CC BY-SA 4.0). I assure that I will follow Commons copyright and licensing rules carefully in future. Thank you.}} VeritasScriptor1 (talk) 13:05, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VeritasScriptor1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I now understand that I was blocked for undisclosed promotional editing, not copyright. I confirm that I have read and understand Wikipedia’s Terms of Use and Conflict of Interest guidelines.

I was not paid or compensated for my edits I created the draft in good faith to provide sourced, neutral information. However, I understand how my edits could appear promotional.

I respectfully ask for an opportunity to contribute constructively within Wikipedia’s rules. Thank you. VeritasScriptor1 (talk) 16:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi there! I have moved your unblock request to the bottom of the page. Keeping your talk page in chronological order is helpful for those reviewing your request. To help us respond to the request, please do the following:

Review Wikipedia’s payment disclosure and conflict of interest policies and guidelines, then explain in your own words how those apply to your block and what you would do differently if unblocked.
Describe the types of edits you would like to make if you were unblocked.

Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:21, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for your message. I understand the concern. I assure you that I’m a real person, not an AI. My earlier appeal may have sounded automated because I tried to be formal and concise.

I’ve read Wikipedia’s guidelines and I’m ready to contribute constructively and follow all policies. VeritasScriptor1 (talk) 07:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not saying you are AI, I’m saying you used AI to compose your appeal. The main reason we don’t accept AI-generated appeals is that when you say “I understand X” and “I confirm Y”, we have no confidence that you actually do, if you’re just copypasting what AI told you to write. That’s why we want you, the person, to tell us in your own words.

You also need to address clearly each of the points in the block notice above, not just make sweeping general statements like “I’m ready to […] follow all policies”. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply