User talk:Asmrrb: Difference between revisions

Line 76: Line 76:

:::I note that the paragraph has three apparently good sources, albeit two are interviews with Paul Black. Is there some dispute between you over the facts? [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] (Pigsonthewing); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy’s edits]] 18:15, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

::::Actually, {{yo|Yamla}}, I think he does have a say in what images of himself are used on Wikipedia. [[User:Deepfriedokra|-- Deepfriedokra]] ([[User talk:Deepfriedokra|talk]]) 18:18, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

:::::Well, I’ll ”certainly” grant this newly uploaded image is substantially better, in any case. If nobody else has replaced that image on the article, I’ll go and do so immediately. I’m not weighing in on the content of the article, just on the image. –[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 18:21, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

== A better picture ==

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Mick Cripps, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it’s wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you’d like to experiment with the wiki’s syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:20, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Discospinster. I noticed that in this edit to Mick Cripps, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. … discospinster _talk 16:27, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Mick Cripps, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. While you did provide an edit summary of your actions, you didn’t explain your reason for removal. It’s preferred to do so on the talk page of the article. x2step (lets talk 💌) 16:40, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

please unblock . I removed a photo which was not approved for usage and made an edit to the content which was not historically accurate. thank you. Asmrrb (talk) 17:18, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Helped
this page is about myself and some of the information is inaccurate. I tried to edit the information and remove an image that I feel violates my privacy… please advise. thank you.
Asmrrb (talk) 17:24, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help for more information.

Wikipedia’s policy on how to handle material about living persons, biographies of living persons, applies to every page on the project, including talk pages. If Wikipedia has published material about you, or someone you represent, and you need help, you can:

“All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking.”

Please discuss content and sourcing on article talk page and achieve consensus for any changes Please make WP:EDITREQUESTs on the article’s talk page. — Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:30, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Discospinster: would it be OK to convert to a partial block from the article Mick Cripps ? — Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel the need. … discospinster _talk 17:42, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Asmrrb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the page that I attempted to edit has incorrect information about myself and contains an image which

I attempted to remove that I do not give permission to use. I want the image removed and the content which is not historically accurate removed. I can provide a better image of myself

thank you. Asmrrb (talk) 17:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=the page that I attempted to edit has incorrect information about myself and contains an image which

I attempted to remove that I do not give permission to use. I want the image removed and the content which is not historically accurate removed. I can provide a better image of myself

thank you. [[User:Asmrrb|Asmrrb]] ([[User talk:Asmrrb#top|talk]]) 17:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=the page that I attempted to edit has incorrect information about myself and contains an image which

I attempted to remove that I do not give permission to use. I want the image removed and the content which is not historically accurate removed. I can provide a better image of myself

thank you. [[User:Asmrrb|Asmrrb]] ([[User talk:Asmrrb#top|talk]]) 17:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=the page that I attempted to edit has incorrect information about myself and contains an image which

I attempted to remove that I do not give permission to use. I want the image removed and the content which is not historically accurate removed. I can provide a better image of myself

thank you. [[User:Asmrrb|Asmrrb]] ([[User talk:Asmrrb#top|talk]]) 17:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Again, the image is being used appopriately according to the license. You don’t get to approve or reject its use, assuming the video source is not yours. If on the other hand, the video source (i.e. the youtube channel that uploaded it) belongs to you, you freely licensed it. This is important. You need to stop claiming you didn’t give permission to use that image because that’s not relevant and it’s important you understand it isn’t relevant. —Yamla (talk) 17:45, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are, of course, free to provide a better image. It will need to be freely licensed, including for commercial use. —Yamla (talk) 17:48, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I upload new image to wiki

please use this image, it is of myself.

I would appreciate you removing the first paragraph as well, if you can…

it is historically inaccurate .

thank you. Asmrrb (talk) 18:01, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In what way is it inaccurate? Can you tell us the correct version, and give reliable sources where that can be verified?

I note that the paragraph has three apparently good sources, albeit two are interviews with Paul Black. Is there some dispute between you over the facts? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy’s edits 18:15, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, @Yamla:, I think he does have a say in what images of himself are used on Wikipedia. — Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:18, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I’ll certainly grant this newly uploaded image is substantially better, in any case. If nobody else has replaced that image on the article, I’ll go and do so immediately. I’m not weighing in on the content of the article, just on the image. —Yamla (talk) 18:21, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:A picture of you for details of how you can provide a new photo; and WP:About you for general info on how to deal with issues in an article about you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy’s edits 18:02, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply