User talk:Ritzy 66: Difference between revisions

Line 199: Line 199:

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!– Template:Db-draft-deleted –><!– Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom –> [[User:Liz|””’L””’iz]] [[Special:Contributions/Liz|””’Read!””’]] [[User talk:Liz|””’Talk!””’]] 01:26, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Val Stanton|Val Stanton]] (October 19) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by LuniZunie was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. ”Reliable” sources are required so that information can be [[WP:Verifiability|verified]]. If you need help with referencing, please see [[Help:Referencing for beginners|Referencing for beginners]] and [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|Citing sources]].|}}<!–

—

–> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Val Stanton]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Val_Stanton ”’Articles for creation help desk”’], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LuniZunie&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Val_Stanton ”’reviewer’s talk page”’] or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

{{Linear-gradient text|#fb0|#f0b|text=– [[User:LuniZunie|”LuniZunie”]] ツ|direction=right}}([[User talk:LuniZunie|talk]]) 00:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Qcne (talk) 18:10, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ritzy 66!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 18:10, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Chris Pelosi, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ritzy 66. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Val Stanton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HickoryOughtShirt?4 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:25, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Tina Corri. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs to be verifiable; several sections and statements are unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:36, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GoldRomean were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

GoldRomean (talk) 04:03, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CSMention269 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 08:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Walter Stanton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 04:59, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

your article is not good enough for wikipedia, yet. Currently it is just a sentence, with no sources. Please try and add more content and sources to your articles before publishing them. you can find it at Draft:Walter Plimmer Jr. If you have any questions you can visit my talk page. Masohpotato (talk) 01:50, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Yes I was just saving his for later. I was actually hoping someone else could help me with another draft of mine. Val Stanton is the name of the draft. I have a whole lot of info on it. Could you check if it’s valid? I already submitted it for publication. Ritzy 66 (talk) 02:14, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiMentor01 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

WikiMentor01 (talk) 12:34, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ritzy 66, Stanton might be notable but because of the poor sources and WP:Original research it is difficult to tell. What I suggest is kind of starting over first by using only the sources that might meet the notability criteria then only using reliable primary sources to fill in gaps. You absolutely need to scrap all the unreliable sources and the content supported by them. A lot of it is great for genealogy sites like WikiTree but not appropriate here. It will be a much shorter article but that’s ok. S0091 (talk) 19:23, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nolan Stevens requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nolan Stevens. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:26, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ritzy 66

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Grahaml35, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Frank Maffei, for deletion because it’s a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Grahaml35}}. And, don’t forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Grahaml35 (talk) 01:00, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well sadly Frank Passed yesterday so it’s under a deceased person. All of the news hasn’t came out yet. 2601:8C:401:9380:FD96:6994:57D:8736 (talk) 01:37, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Frank Maffei. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and require more context.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma (talk) 03:55, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ritzy 66. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tina Corri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ritzy 66. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, “Tina Corri“.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:26, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LuniZunie was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

– LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 00:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply