From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|
:I guess I’ve been burned a few times for bypassing AfC after deletion. Wanted to go by the perceived book. [[User:Thriley|Thriley]] ([[User talk:Thriley|talk]]) 15:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC) |
:I guess I’ve been burned a few times for bypassing AfC after deletion. Wanted to go by the perceived book. [[User:Thriley|Thriley]] ([[User talk:Thriley|talk]]) 15:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:I’ll be honest, I have no idea how I came to draftify and apparently subsequently watchlist this as I didn’t close [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drop Site News]]. I haven’t dug deeply into this to know whether I’d !vote to retain at an AfD, but I certainly don’t see a reason to nominate it. It’s not a G4 and we have established editors involved in its creation, so there’s no reason to force AfC. [[User:Star Mississippi|<span style=”color:#be33ff;”>Star</span>]] [[User talk:Star Mississippi|<span style=”color:#ff33da;”>Mississippi</span>]] 01:20, 14 May 2025 (UTC) |
:I’ll be honest, I have no idea how I came to draftify and apparently subsequently watchlist this as I didn’t close [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drop Site News]]. I haven’t dug deeply into this to know whether I’d !vote to retain at an AfD, but I certainly don’t see a reason to nominate it. It’s not a G4 and we have established editors involved in its creation, so there’s no reason to force AfC. [[User:Star Mississippi|<span style=”color:#be33ff;”>Star</span>]] [[User talk:Star Mississippi|<span style=”color:#ff33da;”>Mississippi</span>]] 01:20, 14 May 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
== Tlp news in muredky == |
|||
|
Tlp [[Special:Contributions/2407:AA80:126:8E5:9055:A22A:2095:D02A|2407:AA80:126:8E5:9055:A22A:2095:D02A]] ([[User talk:2407:AA80:126:8E5:9055:A22A:2095:D02A|talk]]) 16:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:40, 20 October 2025
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 July 2024. The result of the discussion was Delete (subsequently restored to Draft). |
@Thriley, إيان, and Pppery:, I’m wondering why there’s some effort to enforce AfC on this article, which is substantially different from the article deleted a year ago? As far as I know there is no requirement for an article to go through AfC, even if it has been deleted in the past. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:34, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, it seems entirely tedious and unnecessary. إيان (talk) 15:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- I guess I’ve been burned a few times for bypassing AfC after deletion. Wanted to go by the perceived book. Thriley (talk) 15:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- I’ll be honest, I have no idea how I came to draftify and apparently subsequently watchlist this as I didn’t close Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drop Site News. I haven’t dug deeply into this to know whether I’d !vote to retain at an AfD, but I certainly don’t see a reason to nominate it. It’s not a G4 and we have established editors involved in its creation, so there’s no reason to force AfC. Star Mississippi 01:20, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Tlp 2407:AA80:126:8E5:9055:A22A:2095:D02A (talk) 16:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
