User talk:Draymondlabiad: Difference between revisions

Line 39: Line 39:

::::::Let’s write it again: “Being part of a generation” means honestly nothing… ”’Bilal Nadir is responsible too?”’ He’s also “part of the generation” as he was called up once…

::::::Let’s write it again: “Being part of a generation” means honestly nothing… ”’Bilal Nadir is responsible too?”’ He’s also “part of the generation” as he was called up once…

::::::How was that not a question? [[User:BrazilianDude70|<span style=”color:orange”>BRDude<sup>70</sup></span>]] ([[User talk:BrazilianDude70|<span style=”color:purple”>talk</span>]]) 15:49, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

::::::How was that not a question? [[User:BrazilianDude70|<span style=”color:orange”>BRDude<sup>70</sup></span>]] ([[User talk:BrazilianDude70|<span style=”color:purple”>talk</span>]]) 15:49, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

:::::::I thought that was a rhetoric question. If you compare a player who was called up once or twice with a nt staple for almost 11 years you must rethink what youre saying [[User:Draymondlabiad|Draymondlabiad]] ([[User talk:Draymondlabiad#top|talk]]) 15:53, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

== September 2025 ==

== September 2025 ==

The official name of the league is “Botla Pro” someone seems to not accept that for whatever reason. Im new to Wikipedia but can someone please educate this person to refrain from their vandalism

  • Hi. Let me offer you some advice, if I may. First of all, making a remark about something or someone on your own talk page is going to be read and responded to only by accident. Second, saying “someone” without pointing at someone is a bit childish. We’re all adults here: name the person and the infraction, or don’t say anything at all. Thirdly, “vandalism” is a very precise term, and it does not apply to the edits of your opponent: read WP:VANDAL, first paragraph, and please choose your words more carefully. Fourthly, if you are new to a big project like this, perhaps you should tread more carefully, especially when edit warring and accusing longterm editors of being a vandal. What you could do, instead of edit warring and accusing, is start a discussion on a talk page about the proper naming of this or that. I see you participated (well) in a discussion that RevampedEditor started, but you are saying nothing of substance there–and I encourage you to maintain some decorum in these discussions rather than writing up Gen-Z phrases without proper punctuation or capitalization. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:45, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon, from Portugal,

yes, the page has been vandalised, you are correct. But not by me, per WP rules the Moroccan league is called Botola not “Botola Pro”. I have already reported this.

Again, good afternoon. RevampedEditor (talk) 16:02, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The headline is shortened but this is not the name of the league the Wikipedia page shows clearly that the league is called Botola Pro it is even on the logo and it is good that you reported it maybe others can show you that you are wrong Draymondlabiad (talk) 16:05, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Draymondlabiad please stop your personal attacks over @RevampedEditor and cease to edit-war. You do not own this article and your recent edits are indeeed mainly composed of trivia to “peacocking” the man.
Those two awards you included (the 532 ones) are pure trivia, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 170#GiantSnowman: Premier League Save of the Month is a trivial award. Clearly explains what you’re doing and why it’s wrong, so please stop edit-warring and offending others because you don’t own the article.
Thank you, BRDude70 (talk) 13:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which personal attacks? I have not engaged with anyone and my changes ate repeatedly changed without proper reason Draymondlabiad (talk) 15:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Draymondlabiad: The reason for those changes were given to you in every edit summary where you are reverted. Furthermore, you fail to engage in a proper conversation without reaching any consensus (why do you feel the need to change “Olympic Games Bronze medal” to “Olympic Games Bronze” or “Olympic Bronze Medal” when this is not used in other articles is beyond me), plus calling other people “vandal” and not apologizing can be considered a form of personal attack, people might get offended to it.
Please gather consensus and stop engaging into edit wars, otherwise you’ll be blocked. Cheers, BRDude70 (talk) 16:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

olympic bronze medal is used in other articles besides if someone is hurt by words that arebt even remotely insulting on the internet i dont know what to tell ya Draymondlabiad (talk) 16:04, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your note clearly says, in the end, “Im new to Wikipedia but can someone please educate this person to refrain from their VANDALISM”, something i never did in this article or another one. Nevermind, cheers and goodbye (and i leave the Olympic honour as you have it, just please do not insert the 532 honours again as they are not accepted here)! RevampedEditor (talk) 16:08, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This note at the top of your page, dedicated to me: “The official name of the league is “Botla Pro” someone seems to not accept that for whatever reason. Im new to Wikipedia but can someone please educate this person to refrain from their vandalism”. Also (and again) please stop writing the Olympic honour as “Summer Olympic Bronze”, first we write the competition then what type of medal was won.

Good afternoon. Ah, and please note, no one is reverting anything you add if it’s proper additions (the Botola individual honours you add are very good, but the 532 honours are not valid, please STOP) —RevampedEditor (talk) 15:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The best xi for the group stage was officially announced by CAF so how is that not an honour? Draymondlabiad (talk) 19:18, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We do not add monthly individual honours anymore. Also, we do not need another source for him being voted goalkeeper of the season in Morocco, the is enough! Also, what does that Morocco record have to do specifically with Munir when Yassine Bounou is the starter (i should not have let that in, but i did)?!
Continue to add irrelevant stuff, they will continue to be reverted (and not just by me, in case you want to think i have something against you. This is an ENCYCLOPEDIA and this how an ENCYCLOPEDIA works)! Not even after TWO blocks you notice that what you are doing is wrong?

Good afternoon. RevampedEditor (talk) 09:34, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Moroccan record has obviously to do with him as he is part of the generation that achieved it and played matches throughout this run Draymondlabiad (talk) 01:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Draymondlabiad: “Being part of a generation” means honestly nothing… Bilal Nadir is responsible too? He’s also “part of the generation” as he was called up once…
Please stop WP:PEACOCKing Moroccan articles, stick to facts and contribute in a useful way. Furthermore, before creating an article, make sure it complies with WP:GNG (Mohamed Ouahbi clearly doesn’t). BRDude70 (talk) 02:46, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh it definitely means something especially if youre a corr member and costantly called upon player for a decade Draymondlabiad (talk) 04:48, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Draymondlabiad: You didn’t answer my question. If it’s not explicitly described in your source, it’s not up to you to decide whether a player is a “core member” of the NT or not. BRDude70 (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

there wasnt any question Draymondlabiad (talk) 15:44, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let’s write it again: “Being part of a generation” means honestly nothing… Bilal Nadir is responsible too? He’s also “part of the generation” as he was called up once…
How was that not a question? BRDude70 (talk) 15:49, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that was a rhetoric question. If you compare a player who was called up once or twice with a nt staple for almost 11 years you must rethink what youre saying Draymondlabiad (talk) 15:53, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I’m Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jeremie Frimpong, but you didn’t provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it’s important that article content be verifiable. If you’d like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:41, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Frimpong was part of Leverkusen when they became runners up in the europa league so i simply added that
Heres a source
https://www.uefa.com/uefaeuropaleague/match/2039971–atalanta-vs-leverkusen/lineups/ Draymondlabiad (talk) 16:44, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You know, by now, that you should give a proper source when you make the edit, in the article–a secondary source, really. I don’t know why you’re explaining what the source is under a warning on your own talk page. Drmies (talk) 20:14, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marrakech International Film Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English languages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock

October 2025

Notice

The article Mohamed Ouahbi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails both WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BRDude70 (talk) 02:47, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Draymondlabiad. Thank you for your work on Mohamed Ouahbi. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Since it falls under WP:BLP, please add a source for the first sentence of the “Early life and education” section. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 14:41, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and yes i will Draymondlabiad (talk) 15:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top