User talk:Joshyyekonsire123: Difference between revisions

Hello, I’m Anachronist. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that in one of your recent contributions to dark energy, you cited a link to a source that may not be reliable. Sources considered unreliable should generally not be used to support statements. Information from an unreliable source can be challenged by other editors and removed. Reliable sources are generally those with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. Self-published material, user-generated content, and certain other outlets such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites or publications with a poor reputation for fact-checking may not meet these standards. If you are unsure about which sources are appropriate, there is a list of sources that are considered generally reliable. Additionally, some WikiProjects have their own lists of sources that are considered reliable for that particular subtopic. If you are still unsure about a source’s reliability, you can ask at the reliable sources noticeboard.

Furthermore, you seem to be edit-warring, restoring the material after it was removed for good reason. Be aware that edit warring can lead to your account being blocked. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 06:36, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]