From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
|||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
|
::Or [https://www.decanter.com/spirits/mizunara-oak-explained-526736/ this one] ?? Both may be a bit borderline.[[User:MisawaSakura|MisawaSakura]] ([[User talk:MisawaSakura|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
::Or [https://www.decanter.com/spirits/mizunara-oak-explained-526736/ this one] ?? Both may be a bit borderline.[[User:MisawaSakura|MisawaSakura]] ([[User talk:MisawaSakura|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:::The first one is certainly too commercial; the second one is enough like a magazine that I guess it’s ok (after all, all newspapers and magazines have a commercial aspect). [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap#top|talk]]) 17:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
:::The first one is certainly too commercial; the second one is enough like a magazine that I guess it’s ok (after all, all newspapers and magazines have a commercial aspect). [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap#top|talk]]) 17:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
::::OK, tyvm. [[User:MisawaSakura|MisawaSakura]] ([[User talk:MisawaSakura|talk]]) 17:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:15, 26 October 2025
- Archives
2006 –11 –
2012 –
2013 –
2014 –
2015 –
2016 –
2017 –
2018 –
2019 –
2020 –
2021 –
2022 –
2023 –
2024 –
2025 –
Your good article nomination of the article William Morris’s influence on Tolkien is 
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crystalite13 — Crystalite13 (talk) 20:33, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
I’m working on Quercus crispula now. The wood is highley prized for whiskey barrels. Would you consider this a reliable source? MisawaSakura (talk) 16:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Or this one ?? Both may be a bit borderline.MisawaSakura (talk) 16:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- The first one is certainly too commercial; the second one is enough like a magazine that I guess it’s ok (after all, all newspapers and magazines have a commercial aspect). Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- OK, tyvm. MisawaSakura (talk) 17:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- The first one is certainly too commercial; the second one is enough like a magazine that I guess it’s ok (after all, all newspapers and magazines have a commercial aspect). Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Or this one ?? Both may be a bit borderline.MisawaSakura (talk) 16:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
