Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 66: Line 66:

”’Temporary semi-protection:”’ Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] – Persistent Vandalism by LTA. [[User:Untamed1910|Untamed1910]] ([[User talk:Untamed1910|talk]]) 13:17, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

”’Temporary semi-protection:”’ Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] – Persistent Vandalism by LTA. [[User:Untamed1910|Untamed1910]] ([[User talk:Untamed1910|talk]]) 13:17, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

:[[File:Pictogram voting support.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] ”'[[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Semi-protection|Semi-protected]]”’&#32;for a period of ”’1 week”’, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.<!– Template:RFPP#semi –> [[User:Isabelle Belato|Isabelle Belato]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Isabelle Belato|🏳‍🌈]]</sup></small> 13:19, 13 September 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 13:19, 13 September 2025

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Temporary full protection: Requesting the unusual step of a 12 to 24 hour full protection of the talk page. The talk page is encroaching on basically being unusable due to traffic and is seeing repeated and sustained WP:BLPCRIME violations DESPITE being under ECP. Believe a short period of full protection might provide enough time for the tempo to reduce and allow for constructive discussion to return. Rambling Rambler (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

( Peanut gallery comment) There are so many eyes on that page right now that any BLPCRIME violation is basically immediately reverted or redacted. tony 16:26, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not an opposition to this proposal, but as far as I know, this would be an almost unprecedented step to take. WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 20:04, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:23, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User BEN917 keeps deleting edits (i.e., A player edit and references from the Notable former players by stint and official transfer section of the article). 2A02:2149:8B9F:700:49A4:BAFC:AC25:5E40 (talk) 19:43, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:27, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Since the page’s protection level was lowered to indef WP:PCPP after a 16-year WP:SEMI reign, all edits have been instances of vandalism from IP editors. If this continues, editors could be potentially overwhelmed by their duty to review changes. For this reason — and the fact that the page’s lowered protection was because of a request — I suggest the page should retain its former protection level. If an avalanche of vandalism resumes after a 16 year long protection is lifted, I can’t imagine the page’s future being very bright. Giovanni Potage (talk) 07:27, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Favonian as the admin who reduced protection to pending changes so they can weigh in. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:50, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Four reverts in six days is not what I would call an “avalanche”. I’m inclined to let the experiment run for a while longer to gather more data, but I won’t object if another admin decides to re-protect. Favonian (talk) 13:07, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 11:29, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:30, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Look at yesterday’s edits too, all this vandalism happened in 15 hours, making it an edit war as it is less than 24 hours. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 11:35, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Frost 11:36, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:38, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request temporary protection due to persistent unreferenced BLP COI editing by both account and IP. Encoded  Talk 💬 11:41, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Frost 12:04, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Untamed1910 (talk) 13:08, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:18, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Untamed1910 (talk) 13:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:19, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism by LTA. Untamed1910 (talk) 13:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:19, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Vandalism by LTA. Untamed1910 (talk) 13:17, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:19, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top