Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excess insurance: Difference between revisions

Excess insurance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I may not know much about insurance, but I know how to read a reference. As of rev 1277633329:

• ref 1: can’t access the 2011 edition
• red 2: accessed the book, same ISBN and everything, and page 112 is not about “excess insurance” but rather life insurance – I could find no other mention of the term “excess insurance”.
• ref 3: the III does not appear to have published an article by that name [1], and the reference itself leads to “example.com”
• ref 4: same story[2], url listed in our article is a fake

With two out of the three references being fictitious, and another not verifying what the content says, I’m proposing that we WP:TNT this article. If somebody I trust rewrites it, I’ll be happy to withdraw the nomination. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 18:56, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m the one who originally created this article, and I have to admit I have messed up pretty badly here… I’ve now removed all the sources and replaced them with correct ones, so this should be solved.

What happened: I had written this with the help of an LLM, checked and rewrote the content, then did some copy-editing in a separate tab of my browser to remove the hallucinated sources, etc. But for some reason, I see that I ended up publishing the wrong version, with the hallucinated sources, instead of the corrected one… :S

I’m very sorry about this, and thanks for spotting this! 7804j (talk) 19:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is why we dont use LLM. ←Metallurgist (talk) 20:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thank you for doing that! I’ll withdraw this now. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 20:19, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I actually think this is still not independently notable. Could you leave it up so we can have the process? ←Metallurgist (talk) 20:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

!voting for anything other than !keep automatically nullifies my ability to withdraw, so feel free! I will go back to my default opinion “I may not know much about insurance” for the remainder of the AfD. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 20:23, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]