From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|
* ”’Delete”’: The sources presented in the article are entirely press releases, some of which explicitly state “sponsored content”, and read as promotional. There is no [[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent coverage]] of the company to establish its notability. — [[User:Reconrabbit|<span style=”color:#4E8321″>Recon</span>]][[User talk:Reconrabbit|<span class=”skin-invert” style=”color:#073131″>rabbit</span>]] 13:32, 29 October 2025 (UTC) <!–VCB Reconrabbit–> |
* ”’Delete”’: The sources presented in the article are entirely press releases, some of which explicitly state “sponsored content”, and read as promotional. There is no [[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent coverage]] of the company to establish its notability. — [[User:Reconrabbit|<span style=”color:#4E8321″>Recon</span>]][[User talk:Reconrabbit|<span class=”skin-invert” style=”color:#073131″>rabbit</span>]] 13:32, 29 October 2025 (UTC) <!–VCB Reconrabbit–> |
||
|
*”’Keep”’ I see that specific, narrow industry coverage provides sufficient sourcing; the company’s billion-dollar trading volume and global activity may have generated additional notable coverage in regional press elsewhere. [[User:Never-ending string|Never-ending string]] ([[User talk:Never-ending string|talk]]) 13:48, 31 October 2025 (UTC) |
*”’Keep”’ I see that specific, narrow industry coverage provides sufficient sourcing; the company’s billion-dollar trading volume and global activity may have generated additional notable coverage in regional press elsewhere. [[User:Never-ending string|Never-ending string]] ([[User talk:Never-ending string|talk]]) 13:48, 31 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
*”’Keep”’ Enough sources and I found a few through google linking the compoany to oil smuggling and corruption. [[User:Agnieszka653|Agnieszka653]] ([[User talk:Agnieszka653|talk]]) 00:46, 1 November 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:46, 1 November 2025
- Alkagesta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP, No Reliable Sources., The Sources that presented in the article are unreliable. Article needs Reliable Sources and Seconday Sources. Untamed1910 (talk) 22:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Malta. Shellwood (talk) 00:42, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Keep — The topic appears to meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. There are reliable and independent sources available or can be added that discuss Alkagesta. The article can be improved with citations from books, academic papers, and independent media. Deletion is unnecessary when the article can be improved. JosefBrine (talk) 09:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nope, Sources were press releases and There is no independent coverage of the company to establish its notability. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:56, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: The sources presented in the article are entirely press releases, some of which explicitly state “sponsored content”, and read as promotional. There is no independent coverage of the company to establish its notability. — Reconrabbit 13:32, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Keep I see that specific, narrow industry coverage provides sufficient sourcing; the company’s billion-dollar trading volume and global activity may have generated additional notable coverage in regional press elsewhere. Never-ending string (talk) 13:48, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Enough sources and I found a few through google linking the compoany to oil smuggling and corruption. Agnieszka653 (talk) 00:46, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
