User talk:Joyous!: Difference between revisions

Line 479: Line 479:

::::Who? <span style=”font-family:Trebuchet MS; border-radius:35% 0; font-weight:bold; background:linear-gradient(300deg,#ff0d00,#1AD); color:#fff; padding:2px 5px;”>[[User:Gommeh|<span style=”color: white;”>Gommeh</span>]] [[User:Gommeh/Guestbook|📖]]   [[User talk:Gommeh|🎮]]</span> 14:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

:::::Salebot’s. They’ve got about a zillion different sockpuppet accounts. [[User:Joyous!|Joyous!]] [[User_talk:Joyous%21|Noise!]] 14:40, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

== Adminship Anniversary!==

<!– ##RW UNDERDATE## –>

<div class=”boilerplate metadata” style=”background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center”>[[File:Icon tools.svg|50px|left]]<span style=”font-weight:bold;font-size:125%; padding-bottom: 1em;”>Happy Adminship Anniversary!</span>[[File:Nuvola apps date.svg|50px|right]]

Have a very [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=rights&page=User%3AJoyous! happy adminship anniversary] on your special day!

Best wishes, [[User:DaniloDaysOfOurLives|DaniloDaysOfOurLives]] ([[User talk:DaniloDaysOfOurLives|talk]]) 06:16, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>

Don’t worry about making an article perfect. Just make it better.

This user’s talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. Their input is welcome, and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,19, 20, 21 22

Hi, please revdel the revisions as well. Thanks, —Matrix _{ping me}^{when u reply} (t? – _c) 19:40, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Thanks for the reminder: I have no idea why I didn’t do that at the time. (Looks at my dog who needed a walk) Oh yeah; that’s why. Joyous! Noise! 19:43, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries lol we all got a life outside this website 😉 —Matrix _{ping me}^{when u reply} (t? – _c) 20:10, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for the preventing vandalism of this page. Can you please adding our national flag? Thanks. 200SUDEA (talk) 22:49, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They are at it again. Would you mind a block and rev/del please. 2600:100E:B064:3D29:0:28:8BBF:6A01 (talk · contribs) Sorry 😞 Knitsey (talk) 21:22, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Knitsey (talk) 21:33, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ick Joyous! Noise! 23:43, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HI 🙂

I just saw this edit of a really long write-up about a high school student, kinda like a resume with all their roles and achievements.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mitchell_County_High_School&curid=23905586&diff=1307840488&oldid=1307750931

And I know I should revert this but I don’t know under what. Like NOPV, WP:NOTRESUME, promotion or like all of the above. I’m probably over thinking this (I am) built I just wanted to ask.

Thx, ✦GLORPK4✦ | 📡 01:05, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. Happy to help. I just kicked it out under the guidelines of WP:LISTBIO, which basically says you shouldn’t drop names into articles like that if they don’t have their own article. Joyous! Noise! 01:07, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

tysm! ✦GLORPK4✦ | 📡 01:08, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

they revereted my edit at Lilly Contino even though i added a source and they called it “nonsense” check my talk page for more info Astrawiki3203 (talk) 21:26, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There’s some really bad stuff happening at User talk:Long term abuse of babies. Can you please revoke TPA and revdel the edits? Thank you for responding. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 02:28, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoked already. Joyous! Noise! 02:30, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And rev/del on the edits that qualify. Joyous! Noise! 02:31, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 02:32, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This edit to Shit Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 19:49, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also this one to the same page Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 19:50, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This edit also to the same page Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 19:56, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And this one also Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 19:59, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Joyous! Noise! 21:19, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I looked at the history of the page because I know that DAB pages with titles like this can be common targets for vandalism Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 21:23, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noooooo! That would NEVER happen. Joyous! Noise! 21:25, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2025).

Guideline and policy news

An RfC is open on whether use of emojis with no encyclopedic value in mainspace and draftspace (e.g., at the start of paragraphs or in place of bullet points) should be added as a criterion under G15.

Technical news

Arbitration

The arbitration case Article titles and capitalisation 2 has been closed.
An RfC is in progress to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

Still going strong!

🪷 nahida 22:32, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Joyous! Noise! 22:36, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Pigeon Detectives – Revert of the xylophone player.

1. Cheers, I actually got my first “Could not revert” error as you beat me to the punch 🙂

2. Did you find “Paul Spooner (drums, 2004)” in any of the cites? my revert was taking away both the former players not mentioned anywhere, But you only reverted the Xylophone player. Did you find source for Paul spooner?

Cheers!
WikiPidge (talk) 00:50, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t, but I wasn’t looking for his name. Glancing at the tabs I still have open, I’m not seeing it. Joyous! Noise! 00:52, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the evergreen high school page in Colorado he won’t accept the fact he’s wrong Astrawiki3203 (talk) 21:25, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) FYI, this is now at WP:AN/3. —tony 21:29, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure that he’s wrong. I understand that Wikipedia is not a newspaper, but it’s not outside the bounds of reason that a well-sourced mention of the event would be in the school’s article. Whether he’s right or wrong, you’ve got to drop the stick for a while, due to 3RR violations. Outside of obvious vandalism (which that is not), you can’t revert to your preferred version right now. Joyous! Noise! 22:22, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I protected the page at the same time as you did but mine was only for one week. I put it back to two weeks. … discospinster _talk 23:40, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Thanks for all you do. Joyous! Noise! 23:41, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June Foray voiced Rocky the Flying Squirrel. 67.246.146.194 (talk) 13:14, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give me some context for this comment? I’m not sure what you’re talking about. Joyous! Noise! 13:17, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. 67.246.146.194 (talk) 13:19, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not OP, but I’ll provide the context anyway: earlier in the summer, there were a couple of rounds of vandalism to Rocky & Bullwinkle (2014 film), falsely claiming that David Spade had voiced the lead character in it. You were involved in reverting one round, and this IP was involved in reverting another.

So I don’t know why 67 is bringing this up two months after the fact, to you (and me, even though I had nothing to do with it, and merely removed the page from a bunch of redlinked categories around the same time) instead of the actual vandal (who, in fact, has already been blocked) — and 67’s also cruising for a temporary editblock of their own if they don’t stop harassing people who had nothing to do with it — but that’s the missing context. Bearcat (talk) 13:55, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. You should change your username to DetectiveBearcat. Joyous! Noise! 13:58, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bullwinkle appeared the the Macys parade! 2603:7081:1F00:1BDC:5DED:FDF0:AEA6:FBC5 (talk) 01:12, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 70, July–August 2025

New collections:
- Times of Malta
- Africa Intelligence
- Intelligence Online
- La Lettre
- Glitz
Spotlight: Wikimania

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 13:16, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User:Joyous! and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Can you please RD3 their edit summaries/edits? ~delta ^{(talk • cont)} 17:56, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~I don’t think those summaries rise to the level of disruption that warrents rev/del. They basically say “I don’t like these folks,” which, while not exactly civil, isn’t all that terrible.~~ Joyous! Noise! 18:13, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@~delta:Had a conversation with another admin, who convinced me that rev/del was appropriate in this case. Sorry for the earlier refusal. Joyous! Noise! 19:51, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please revoke the ip’s talk page access as this ip appears to be abusing it’s talk page while blocked. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:11, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I thought I did that when I blocked. Clearly…not. Joyous! Noise! 03:13, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I saw someone added an unsourced addition to this guy’s page that you reverted. It was then re-added which I reverted. Do you have the power to lock the page or otherwise prevent the back and forth without citation?

Thank you. Manamanadodododo (talk) 01:10, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also note – when they redid it, they re-added a link that already existed and makes no reference to their claim. Manamanadodododo (talk) 01:12, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the message. We have the technical ability to lock a page if it’s going through a lot of vandalism, but the rate of changes to Michael E. Farbiarz doesn’t justify it, based on Wikipedia’s guidelines. Your best bet is probably to add his article to your watchlist so you can see when it’s edited. Joyous! Noise! 01:17, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I’m not on wiki much and randomly decided to log in when I looked up the guy, saw the claim, and tried to figure out its veracity. But if I happen to return and see it changed again without a source, I’ll repeat the undo.

Thanks. Manamanadodododo (talk) 01:24, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This IP has vandalized (including in own talk page) for many minutes without being blocked. Please remove some revisions by this IP from public view. Manualbadeditfix (talk) 03:09, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

plastic is an integral ingredient of siracha sauce 2600:1700:2C2C:3010:2813:1003:F52:19AF (talk) 21:45, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source?? Joyous! Noise! 21:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it seeps out of the plastic bottle 2600:1700:2C2C:3010:2813:1003:F52:19AF (talk) 21:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source? Joyous! Noise! 21:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

is wikipedia a reliable source?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microplastics 2600:1700:2C2C:3010:2813:1003:F52:19AF (talk) 21:50, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t see a mention of sriacha in that link. Seriously, even if microplastics leach into a product from its container, that doesn’t mean it’s an ingredient. If you’re going to add info like that, you really need to have a reliable published source that mentions sriacha specifically. Joyous! Noise! 21:54, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2025).

Administrator changes

CheckUser changes

Vanamonde93

Arbitration

After a motion, arbitration enforcement page protections no longer need to be logged in the AELOG. A bot now automatically posts protections at WP:AELOG/P. To facilitate this bot, protection summaries must include a link to the relevant CT page (e.g. [[WP:CT/BLP]]), and you will receive talk page reminders if you forget to specify the contentious topic but otherwise indicate it is an AE action.

By an IP you blocked, User:67.81.46.91. Should they be blocked again? — Ssilvers (talk) 03:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just gave them a final warning for unsourced content, and reverted a bunch of their edits. We’ll see from here. I’ll be going offline shortly, so if they continue, you can report at WP:AIV. Joyous! Noise! 04:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. User:67.81.46.91 is continuing to vandalize Sia. — Ssilvers (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for keeping an eye on things. Joyous! Noise! 20:27, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This is their 2nd 2-week block in 2-1/2 months. I am of the opinion that IP editing was useful to the project for its first 10+ years, but now I think we should require registration but let IPs suggest edits on the Talk pages. — Ssilvers (talk) 22:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Traffic report: One click after another
Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit “Kantara” crowd the tubes.

Hey there, unless I am missing something it appears that Dujfchhfjdhdhsy’s edits were attempting to revert vandalism. Although doing so did sometimes revert to a previous edition of the page which still contained vandalism. [1][2] Greyjoy^talk 05:12, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think they were doing some of both. [3] (and several others). I did adjust their block time down to 60 hours, and was in fact leaving them a message about that when you and I edit-conflicted. Joyous! Noise! 05:16, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OH!! I see what was happening, and you were right. Will revert and apologize. Thank you for catching that. Joyous! Noise! 05:17, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May also want to revdel the edit summaries across the /64, as they used the same language there. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 01:05, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh. I’ll need another cup of tea for this. Thanks for the heads-up. Joyous! Noise! 01:08, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated an article for deletion. feel free to vote Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trichostylum rufipalpe Wizardics (talk) 23:55, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joyous!. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users’ IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

How do temporary accounts work?

Editing from a temporary account

When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user’s browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account’s name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
- There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
- There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

Temporary account IP viewer user right

How to enable IP Reveal

Impact for administrators

It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won’t be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

Rules about IP information disclosure

Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67’s IP address is 192.0.2.1).
Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if “reasonably believed to be necessary”. (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR, but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
See Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer § What can and can’t be said for more detailed guidelines.

Useful tools for patrollers

It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card, available in Preferences → Appearance → Advanced options → Enable the user info card
- This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.
Special:IPContributions allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.
Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions supports global search for a given temporary account’s activity.
The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

Videos

Further information and discussion

Most of this message was written by Mz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:48, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joyous! Have you read WP:/64? I definitely recommend following that advice. Twinkle has an option to do that by default for IPv6 too. (I just blocked 2409:40d0:ed:2637::/64 since that user had already been bouncing around different addresses within the /64 range. You had blocked a single address on that range while I was looking at it.) Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:49, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Daniel. Weird, bec/ I generally DO block the /64, and it’s my default on Twinkle. Let me dig around to see what happened….[moments later] Aha! They had multiple partial blocks, and Twinkle wouldn’t do it, so I had to block by hand and didn’t tick the right boxes because I don’t normally do it that way. Thanks for catching that, so I’ll be more careful in future when I have to [ugh] do the block the hard way. Joyous! Noise! 14:05, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, no worries. You might find RangeHelper a little bit helpful for that since (among other features) it adds several quick navigation links including /64 links for IPv6 addresses. That being said, based on the administrative work you do, the script I’d really suggest you try is Unfiltered (it overlaps some with User:Ingenuity/AbuseFilterContribs which you use, but see the note at the top of that page). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:49, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I cited in Morgan Jay’s page “His father, Cayetano Venticinque, was a Sicilian singer who performed under the stage name Ricardo Roda. Venticinque moved with his family to Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1948, later leaving Argentina during the 1970s. He died of cancer in Italy, in 1993, when Morgan was six years old.” This was under the Early Life section. I was wondering if you could please explain why you deleted this section? Jay talks about it on podcasts and I’ve done the research and cited it for his page. Thank you. Edu.cast.diaz (talk) 23:44, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies: I honestly didn’t see that part. I was reverting the change of name used throughout. Please feel free to put that back in, and again: I’m sorry I overlooked it. Joyous! Noise! 00:02, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining. It’s my first day as a Wikipedia editor. I’m still a little confused! 🙂 Edu.cast.diaz (talk) 00:15, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It can be SO confusing. Please let me know if there’s anything I can help with. If I don’t know an answer, I can send you to someone who does. Joyous! Noise! 00:25, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate that! Edu.cast.diaz (talk) 00:26, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see that there is a lot of unconstructive editing at Mar-a-Lago face, should the article be semi protected? The Great Epiphany (talk) 00:48, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just p-blocked the most recent problem. Subtracting their edits…I’m personally not quite ready to protect. I did add it to my watchlist to keep an eye on things. Joyous! Noise! 00:58, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to do a rangeblock on at least the /16, It doesn’t seem like anything useful is coming from that range. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 04:45, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2025).

Administrator changes

Toadspike

CheckUser changes

asilvering

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Hi there,

Just wondering if you could kindly intervene as administrator with respect to disruptive editing by user The Kip on the Montreal Canadiens main wiki page? As you will note upon review, the user is undoing edits that pertain to accurate franchise leader figures amongst other things. ~2025-31820-38 (talk) 22:27, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Joyous! This temp account is a long-term abuser currently subjected to multiple ban-evasion blocks across multiple IPs, temp accounts, and sockpuppet accounts. I’ve reported them to WP:AIV and reverted their contributions as necessary. The Kip ^(contribs) 23:27, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I already pinged you on AIV but the bot removed it, so I’ll ask you here if you can block the underlying IP of User:~2025-32851-32, as it is a proxy. Thanks! win8x (talk) 15:26, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joyous, I’m having concerns about the potential competency (as much as I hate to say it) about User:Magician Abby. There was an ANI thread last September about their good-faith yet questionable edits to Pennywise. They said (or at least implied) on ANI and on their talk page that they would get a mentor, but the edits have continued with no mentor in sight at the Adopt-A-User. They first started editing in August, and have received warnings from me and from other users for things such as a personal attack, vandalism (which they even admitted), several WP:OR and WP:SYNTH issues, moving pages without prior consensus, and more.

I know they are clearly trying to help, but I think they need to have someone hold their hand, especially since going to ANI did not result in much. I’d love to see this user contribute constructively, especially since their main article of focus is one I brought to GA. Can you let me know what you think should happen next? Gommeh 📖 🎮 23:21, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. That’s…a lot. She’s clearly not getting what “original research” means. I’ve commented back to her at Talk:Pennywise. Maybe if we said something like “You should only add information that was written by another human who isn’t Stephen King.” I don’t know if that would help. At some point, I think there’s some willful misunderstanding, like not going through with the mentorship option. YOU have gone above and beyond with your patient replies. I’m impressed. Joyous! Noise! 03:32, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I thought as much. Is there anything else we should do? I’d rather not resort to sanctions if I can avoid it, but Abby’s good faith edits are more problematic than helpful. Gommeh 📖 🎮 04:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I left a comment on her talk page, also. Let’s hold off until she responds…somehow. Maybe we can decide how best to proceed after that. Joyous! Noise! 05:10, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ps. Do let me know if she goes on a spree of problematic editing again. I’ll try to keep an eye out, but some out-of-house commitments will have my attention diverted for the next few days. Joyous! Noise! 05:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like she removed your comment from the article’s talk page at Special:Diff/1322105587. Gommeh 📖 🎮 14:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to revoke TPA on the My Little Pony vandal you just blocked. They are block evading and did a lot of talk page disruption on their last account. TornadoLGS (talk) 05:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dang it, I always forget. Thanks. Joyous! Noise! 05:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment: based on prior experience earlier this year, this may not be this person’s first rodeo. If I recall correctly, there was a person (bot?) who was constantly putting links to a My Little Pony Friendship is Magic video in unrelated articles at random places. I hope it’s not the same person. Gommeh 📖 🎮 14:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s Salebot Joyous! Noise! 14:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not even their hundredth rodeo. Joyous! Noise! 14:25, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Who? Gommeh 📖 🎮 14:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Salebot’s. They’ve got about a zillion different sockpuppet accounts. Joyous! Noise! 14:40, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]