User talk:ZimZalaBim: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 54: Line 54:

:::The full version of that image already exists on the page. I’d suggest you engage in discussion there if you think the infobox image should be changed. And I suggest you read [[WP:OWNTALK]]: ””purpose of user talk pages is to draw the attention or discuss the edits of a user””. Feel free to remove messages, but you cannot prevent other editors from communicating with you. –[[User:ZimZalaBim|<span style=”color:DimGray”>Zim</span><b style=”color:darkgreen”>Zala</b><span style=”color:DimGray”>Bim</span>]]<sup style=”color:DarkSlateGray”>[[User talk:ZimZalaBim|talk]]</sup> 22:58, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

:::The full version of that image already exists on the page. I’d suggest you engage in discussion there if you think the infobox image should be changed. And I suggest you read [[WP:OWNTALK]]: ””purpose of user talk pages is to draw the attention or discuss the edits of a user””. Feel free to remove messages, but you cannot prevent other editors from communicating with you. –[[User:ZimZalaBim|<span style=”color:DimGray”>Zim</span><b style=”color:darkgreen”>Zala</b><span style=”color:DimGray”>Bim</span>]]<sup style=”color:DarkSlateGray”>[[User talk:ZimZalaBim|talk]]</sup> 22:58, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

::::i’m not trying to not communicate, but I want other editors to follow my talk page rules which do follow the rules [[User:John George III|John George III]] ([[User talk:John George III|talk]]) 03:31, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

::::i’m not trying to not communicate, but I want other editors to follow my talk page rules which do follow the rules [[User:John George III|John George III]] ([[User talk:John George III|talk]]) 03:31, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

::::have u even read my talk page rules [[User:John George III|John George III]] ([[User talk:John George III|talk]]) 03:43, 17 November 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 03:43, 17 November 2025

Hello, Zim—if I may—I’m here because I saw you made some constructive edits to Garry_Tan#Politics in March, and commented that “this all should probably be re-written”. I agree; it’s all over the place, concerned with minutiae, and not all citations are RS. I have started work on a replacement section. however, I am working with a company (not YC) that wants to improve the page, so with my COI I should not edit it directly. Would you be willing to take a look at it when I finish? WWB Too (Talk · COI) 20:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you can use the {{edit COI}} template on that article’s talk page and make your suggestion underneath it. Other editors will then respond. —ZimZalaBim talk 14:00, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing. I’ve just posted the draft and request on the Talk page. If you have time and are inclined to take a look, I’d be interested in your thoughts, whatever they may be. Thanks for your guidance. WWB Too (Talk · COI) 23:44, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I didn’t get as thoughtful a response as I hoped! I’m certainly open to making changes, or taking a slower approach. Since you had opinions about the section, I’d still be interested in your take. WWB Too (Talk · COI) 19:12, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Zim, we are the agency on behalf of UNISOC to make the change that this source is untrue. UNISOC is not controlled by Wise Road Captial. According to the company’s business registration information, there is no one who has lost control of the company. Please let me know which sources do you need to make the change 2400:E920:0:F:250:56FF:FE94:2E2D (talk) 05:32, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This should be discussed on the article’s talk page. —ZimZalaBim talk 05:54, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What edit specifically did you reverse? John George III (talk) 18:32, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A large amount of your recent edits have been reverted by me and others. I’d suggest you explore our WP:WELCOME page to help you learn more about the encyclopedia project and how to contribute constructively. —ZimZalaBim talk 18:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zim, I agree that my edit to the Grokipedia talk page wasn’t aimed at improving that specific page. But I think it’s a useful contribution, so where would you suggest that I put it on the Wikipedia/Wikimedia site? Chris55 (talk) 21:21, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe over at Wikipedia:Village pump. —ZimZalaBim talk 02:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, more specifically in the existing thread here. (There has also been quite a bit of discussion in the “Wikimedia AI” group on Telegram, including some examples of the kind of correction Chris55 talked about; I myself contributed this example involving a 20 year old error.) Regards, HaeB (talk) 05:39, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I see someone at Grokipedia has noticed: suddenly all the edit trails have disappeared! So that useful source has disappeared. Chris55 (talk) 19:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like this Repleh County has something to do with Roblox. I’m guessing we’re dealing with a kid at this point. TornadoLGS (talk) 00:36, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. —ZimZalaBimtalk 02:35, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ZimZalaBim, my edit was factual and I can show you some sources, your message on my talk page violates my talk page rules John George III (talk) 22:49, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to peruse Holy_Roman_Emperor#List_of_emperors and the multitude of other sources that reflect the fact that lothair III preceded Frederick I as HRE. —ZimZalaBimtalk 22:52, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

im talking about my image and also may you address your violation of my talk page rules John George III (talk) 22:55, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
wikipedia is not a reliable source and serious reliable sources state that Frederick’s uncle, Conrad III was his predescessor John George III (talk) 22:57, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not as Holy Roman Emperor. Check your sources. —ZimZalaBimtalk 22:59, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

King of Germany just upgrades ing HRE John George III (talk) 03:30, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The full version of that image already exists on the page. I’d suggest you engage in discussion there if you think the infobox image should be changed. And I suggest you read WP:OWNTALK: “purpose of user talk pages is to draw the attention or discuss the edits of a user”. Feel free to remove messages, but you cannot prevent other editors from communicating with you. —ZimZalaBimtalk 22:58, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i’m not trying to not communicate, but I want other editors to follow my talk page rules which do follow the rules John George III (talk) 03:31, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
have u even read my talk page rules John George III (talk) 03:43, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top