Talk:The Highest Court in the Land: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 1: Line 1:

{{WikiProject banner shell |class=B |listas=Highest Court in the Land, The |1=

{{WikiProject Basketball}}

{{WikiProject United States |importance=Low |DC=yes |DC-importance=Low}}

}}

==Did you know nomination==

==Did you know nomination==


Latest revision as of 05:49, 17 November 2025

  • Source: article’s existence
  • ALT1: … that there is a basketball court above the United States Supreme Court?
  • ALT2: … that the United States Supreme Court is not the Highest Court in the Land?
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: it is a tragedy of cosmic proportions that the photo of Ruth Bader Ginsburg shooting a layup isn’t in the public domain
Moved to mainspace by 1brianm7 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

1brianm7 (talk) 19:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Review as follows: article is new enough, expanded 5x and promoted within the specified timespace, as well as long enough. No concerns regarding the sourcing, it’s all solid. Hook is very catchy and sourced throughout the entire article. No QPQ required. I’d promote ALT0 since it is the safest to go through (verifiable while still quirky), but I personally felt that ALT2 is quirkier. If the author wants ALT 2 to be promoted, specific sourcing is required for the hook since it seems like a synthesis to some extent. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 05:29, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick review! Does this sourcing from the Salt Lake City Tribune source work: “If President Barack Obama really wants to test his skill, he should take it to the nation’s high court. Not the Supreme Court of the United States. The basketball court above it.” 1brianm7 (talk) 06:13, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate for confirming the sourcing of the hook! I hereby endorse ALT2. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 09:54, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on this, I enjoyed reading it 🙂 Anne drew (talk · contribs) 21:51, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I had fun writing it. It turned out much more encyclopedic than I initially expected, to be honest. 1brianm7 (talk) 22:02, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top