User:Audiodude/RSPTest/format2/CoinDesk: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia

 

Line 1: Line 1:

<!– TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL –>

<!– TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL –>

<!– {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/”CoinDesk”}} –>

<!– {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/”CoinDesk”}} –>

{{Infobox

{{Infobox

| title = [[CoinDesk]]

| title = [[CoinDesk]]

| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|200px|alt=logo]] ”(not part of original row)”

| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg||alt=logo]] ”(not part of original row)”

| label2 = source type

| label2 = source type

| data2 = foobar ”(not part of original row)”

| data2 = foobar ”(not part of original row)”

Line 14: Line 13:

| data5 = http://coindesk.com/

| data5 = http://coindesk.com/

| label6 = classification

| label6 = classification

| data6 = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply

| data6 = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply

}}

}}

Line 26: Line 23:

<blockquote>”Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.”</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 190#CoinDesk]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 212#CoinDesk and CoinTelegraph on the article Ethereum]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 236#CoinDesk]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 395#Time to reconsider CoinDesk]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: ”’TBD”’

* Simple summary of prior discussions: There is consensus that CoinDesk should not be used to establish [[WP:N|notability]] for article topics, and that it should be avoided in favor of more mainstream sources. Check CoinDesk articles for [[conflict of interest]] disclosures, and verify whether their parent company at the time (previously [[Digital Currency Group]], now Bullion) has an ownership stake in a company covered by CoinDesk.<ref>{{cite news|accessdate=November 21, 2018|title=Our Portfolio|url=https://dcg.co/portfolio/|website=Digital Currency Group|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180823172706/https://dcg.co/portfolio/|archive-date=August 23, 2018|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>

{{DEFAULTSORT:CoinDesk, Perennial sources}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:CoinDesk, Perennial sources}}

Line 37: Line 38:

== Original table row for comparison ==

== Original table row for comparison ==

”(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)”

”(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)”

{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}

{|

|- class=”s-nc” id=”CoinDesk”

|- class=”s-nc” id=”CoinDesk”

| [[CoinDesk]] <span class=”wp-rsp-sc plainlinks”>[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WP:COINDESK&redirect=no WP:COINDESK]</span><span style=”display: none”>[[:WP:COINDESK]]</span>

| [[CoinDesk]] <span class=”wp-rsp-sc plainlinks”>[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WP:COINDESK&redirect=no WP:COINDESK]</span><span style=”display: none”>[[:WP:COINDESK]]</span>

CoinDesk
logo (not part of original row)
source type foobar (not part of original row)
publisher Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
website http://coindesk.com/
classification No consensus No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply

There is consensus that CoinDesk should not be used to establish notability for article topics, and that it should be avoided in favor of more mainstream sources. Check CoinDesk articles for conflict of interest disclosures, and verify whether their parent company at the time (previously Digital Currency Group, now Bullion) has an ownership stake in a company covered by CoinDesk.[1]

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

  • Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Original table row for comparison

[edit]

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top