From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
|
* Sorted. I don’t think we have a good handle on how best to deal with TAs, given there seem generally to be more of them than with IPs. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 22:19, 20 November 2025 (UTC) |
* Sorted. I don’t think we have a good handle on how best to deal with TAs, given there seem generally to be more of them than with IPs. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 22:19, 20 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
*:Sufficiently obvious accounts, TAs, or IPs should generally be reported to AIV. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 22:19, 20 November 2025 (UTC) |
|||
|
—-<!— All comments go ABOVE this line, please. –> |
—-<!— All comments go ABOVE this line, please. –> |
||
Revision as of 22:19, 20 November 2025
20 November 2025
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
Previously banned for edit warring on Arun Subramanian, see this discussion at the edit warring noticeboard. monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 19:50, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- (an aside – where should I report block evasion, like this? Is an SPI overkill?)
- They also seem to be edit warring on Arun Subramanian again, 3 reverts so far. monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
