From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|
Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. [[User:Jpgordon|–jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇]]</small></sup> 21:06, 23 November 2025 (UTC)|I seriously don’t understand the policies around here or why certain users get to enforce their personal opinions as a part of said policy. I was not under an IP ban and was able to edit without an account. But because I’m trying to follow your rules, I created an account. Somehow, this was considered “illegitimate” use. Nothing that has been done by SounderBruce or Sir Sputnik has been legitimate or fair at any point. They have no basis for this vendetta and the edits I’m making are objectively valuable. [[User:Canes0177|Canes0177]] ([[User talk:Canes0177#top|talk]]) 20:33, 23 November 2025 (UTC)}} |
Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. [[User:Jpgordon|–jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇]]</small></sup> 21:06, 23 November 2025 (UTC)|I seriously don’t understand the policies around here or why certain users get to enforce their personal opinions as a part of said policy. I was not under an IP ban and was able to edit without an account. But because I’m trying to follow your rules, I created an account. Somehow, this was considered “illegitimate” use. Nothing that has been done by SounderBruce or Sir Sputnik has been legitimate or fair at any point. They have no basis for this vendetta and the edits I’m making are objectively valuable. [[User:Canes0177|Canes0177]] ([[User talk:Canes0177#top|talk]]) 20:33, 23 November 2025 (UTC)}} |
||
|
{{unblock|I (1) was blocked because of a personal vendetta by two users, (2) never caused any damage and (3) made nothing but objectively useful contributions. I was also not under an IP ban at the time of this ban which is obvious because I wouldn’t have been able to make any edits. Neither the policies nor the appeals process make any sense whatsoever. [[User:Canes0177|Canes0177]] ([[User talk:Canes0177#top|talk]]) 21:55, 23 November 2025 (UTC)}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 21:55, 23 November 2025
Hello, I’m SounderBruce. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SounderBruce 21:45, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Canes0177 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I seriously don’t understand the policies around here or why certain users get to enforce their personal opinions as a part of said policy. I was not under an IP ban and was able to edit without an account. But because I’m trying to follow your rules, I created an account. Somehow, this was considered “illegitimate” use. Nothing that has been done by SounderBruce or Sir Sputnik has been legitimate or fair at any point. They have no basis for this vendetta and the edits I’m making are objectively valuable. Canes0177 (talk) 20:33, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you:
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. –jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 21:06, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Canes0177 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I (1) was blocked because of a personal vendetta by two users, (2) never caused any damage and (3) made nothing but objectively useful contributions. I was also not under an IP ban at the time of this ban which is obvious because I wouldn't have been able to make any edits. Neither the policies nor the appeals process make any sense whatsoever. [[User:Canes0177|Canes0177]] ([[User talk:Canes0177#top|talk]]) 21:55, 23 November 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I (1) was blocked because of a personal vendetta by two users, (2) never caused any damage and (3) made nothing but objectively useful contributions. I was also not under an IP ban at the time of this ban which is obvious because I wouldn't have been able to make any edits. Neither the policies nor the appeals process make any sense whatsoever. [[User:Canes0177|Canes0177]] ([[User talk:Canes0177#top|talk]]) 21:55, 23 November 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I (1) was blocked because of a personal vendetta by two users, (2) never caused any damage and (3) made nothing but objectively useful contributions. I was also not under an IP ban at the time of this ban which is obvious because I wouldn't have been able to make any edits. Neither the policies nor the appeals process make any sense whatsoever. [[User:Canes0177|Canes0177]] ([[User talk:Canes0177#top|talk]]) 21:55, 23 November 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
