:Thanks for your message and kind feedback. [[User:JulioISalazarG|JulioISalazarG]] ([[User talk:JulioISalazarG#top|talk]]) 03:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
:Thanks for your message and kind feedback. [[User:JulioISalazarG|JulioISalazarG]] ([[User talk:JulioISalazarG#top|talk]]) 03:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
== September 2025 ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, DrBorgI. We [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome]] your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to sources you may be affiliated with.
Editing in this way is a violation of the [[WP:PROMO|policy against using Wikipedia for promotion]] and is a form of [[WP:SELFCITE|conflict of interest]]. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of [[spamming]] on Wikipedia ([[WP:REFSPAM]]); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.
If you wish to continue contributing, please first consider citing other [[WP:RS|reliable secondary sources]] such as review articles that were written by other researchers in your field and that are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite sources for which you may have a conflict of interest, please start a new section on the article’s [[Help:Talk_pages|talk page]] and add {{tl|Edit COI}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.
<!– THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED IF THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. –>{{#ifexpr: ({{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}} – 20250917033118) < 5000000000 | [[Category:User talk pages with conflict of interest notices|{{PAGENAME}}]] | }}<!– Template:uw-coi –> [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) 03:31, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
|
Hello, JulioISalazarG! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking  or by typing four tildes “~~~~”; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being “adopted” by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. |
|---|
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 03:38, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
DrBorgI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 187.189.145.69. I may have been blocked for editing so many times the same document, but it was because I was correcting the source.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, I’m Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Assembly theory, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, it was me who added the content that I deleted because it had mistakes in references. JulioISalazarG (talk) 03:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Assembly theory, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others’ comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 15:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi. A couple comments about this edit: first, Wikipedia articles generally do not use titles like “Dr.” or “Prof.”; see the Manual of Style. Second, it appears that you have duplicated some material that was present earlier in the article. The Hazen et al. paper is currently both reference 9 and reference 16, for example. XOR’easter (talk) 02:35, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Correct. Hazen et al. peer-reviewed paper is already referenced in the Background section of the Assembly theory article. JulioISalazarG is engaged in an edit war and is disruptively trying to reference this paper twice in this article. Guswen (talk) 10:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Assembly theory. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article’s talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Guswen (talk) 10:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Information lifecycle management, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Douglas Santana (talk • contribs) 08:21, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. JulioISalazarG (talk) 16:53, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vehicle infrastructure integration. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 00:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- The edit is not disruptive. I’m not disputing anything there and was just correcting grammatical issues. Please, get sure of double checking before posting on my talk page. Thank you. JulioISalazarG (talk) 00:38, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. A♭m (Ring!) (Notes) 09:43, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- JulioISalazarG, please stop making meaningless 1 byte edits. I assume that, for some reason, you are trying to get to extended confirmed status. But if you achieve this by gaming the system, this status will be removed until you have actually earned it by making meaningful edits. Liz Read! Talk! 01:46, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Two things about references:
- Per WP:LEADCITE, it’s usually not necessary or particularly desirable to add inline references to the lead section of an article, which is meant to be a summary of the cited material in the article body itself.
- It’s also usually unnecessary to add more citations for a single claim. It could be desirable to replace lower quality citations if your replacement makes all the same claims, but simply tacking more on by itself doesn’t really help. Remsense ‥ 论 06:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Florida State–Miami football rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ACC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message and kind feedback. JulioISalazarG (talk) 03:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello, DrBorgI. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to sources you may be affiliated with.
Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.
If you wish to continue contributing, please first consider citing other reliable secondary sources such as review articles that were written by other researchers in your field and that are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite sources for which you may have a conflict of interest, please start a new section on the article’s talk page and add {{Edit COI}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added. MrOllie (talk) 03:31, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
