User talk:Imaonarseal: Difference between revisions

Line 99: Line 99:

* The following is the log entry regarding this message: [[Abortion in the Republic of Ireland]] was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abortion+in+the+Republic+of+Ireland&diff=1325046525&oldid=1324808422 changed] by [[Special:Contributions/Imaonarseal|Imaonarseal]] [[User:Imaonarseal|(u)]] [[User talk:Imaonarseal|(t)]] ANN scored at 0.850197 on 2025-11-30T22:49:30+00:00 <!– MySQL ID: 4454993 –>

Thank you. <!– Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 –><!– Template:uw-vandalism1 –> [[User:ClueBot NG|ClueBot NG]] ([[User talk:ClueBot NG|talk]]) 22:49, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I’m Jay8g. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ferdinand von Prondzynski without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. :Jay8g [V•T•E] 18:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Mode (music), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia’s policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 15:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Ferdinand von Prondzynski, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Please provide an edit summary and discuss your reasons for removing the content on the article’s talk page in the future. Abasteraster (talk) 20:31, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the above, please do not return to the same edit / deletion without a Talk page debate – this relates to past extensive debates. The matters mentioned in these few lines were very material and public, going to the Supreme Court, costing a lot, and relating to one of the subject’s areas of expertise, so some mention seems necessary. SeoR (talk) 22:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to the messages above. Thank you. Polygnotus (talk) 09:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thirty-sixth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abortion in the Republic of Ireland. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can’t find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Abortion in the Republic of Ireland was changed by Imaonarseal (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954104 on 2025-11-18T10:37:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:37, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Foundations of mind requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~2025-31245-28 (talk) 17:37, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Seán Ó Nualláin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imaonarseal, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the articles you created may not meet Wikipedia’s content policies. In short, to be included on Wikipedia, the topic of an article must be notable and have been covered by published reliable and independent sources.

Please read Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article for review. Note that articles are reviewed by volunteers and that it can take some time. If you’d like someone else to create an article, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or the page on contributing to Wikipedia. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:39, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:39, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent, secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

bonadea contributions talk 19:20, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imaonarseal!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 19:20, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abortion in the Republic of Ireland have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:49, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) Act 2018, you may be blocked from editing. Mlkj (talk) 22:55, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]