Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

Line 130: Line 130:

* {{pagelinks|1=Michele Lee}}

”’Temporary semi-protection:”’ [[WP:BLP|BLP]] policy violations. [[User:General Ization|General Ization]] [[User talk:General Ization|Talk ]] 16:58, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

=== [[Alevism]] ===

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: High level of vandalism from numerous users. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk – contribs) 15:11, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA IP hopper has been adding his own name to the page since July, and falsely claiming to be the husband of Isha Ambani (WP:BLP concerns). Yuvaank (talk) 15:19, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indef semi-protect please. Essentially no IP edits in the last year have been constructive. * Pppery * _{it has begun…} 15:45, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection (perhaps until the end of the current TV season on December 17). Reason: High level of unsourced additions by IP editors. — Wikipedical (talk) 16:58, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued random attempts to sanitize this as anything but a far-right concept. User:Bluethricecreamman (Talk·Contribs) 17:28, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent temporary account vandalism. ShallowC (talk) 20:35, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Rapid vandalism by multiple anons Adakiko (talk) 21:16, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated target of IP vandalism, particularly from one SPA evading a block. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥^{(discuss · contribs)} 00:25, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Edit-warring over birth date, picture, middle name, etc. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 03:14, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption?. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 03:17, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting temporary protection due to disruptive editing after a formal Third Opinion decision.

I followed the entire WP:DR process:
• Raised concerns on the Talk Page.
• Other editor (Mortdav) did not respond.
• Requested WP:Third Opinion.
• Third Opinion reviewer confirmed my edits to the Lead and Awards sections were neutral, properly sourced, and compliant with WP:BLP, WP:NPOV, and WP:V.
• Third Opinion reviewer restored my edits.

Immediately after the 3O ruling, the same editor reverted the article again without discussion and accused me of “paid editing” without evidence. This is occurring on a Biography of a Living Person (BLP), where unsourced or promotional claims must be handled carefully.

The editor is:
— ignoring the Talk Page
— ignoring the Third Opinion result
— repeatedly reverting stable, sourced edits
— making improper accusations

This pattern is disruptive on a BLP and undermines consensus.

Requesting temporary semi-protection or extended-confirmed protection while discussion continues.

Jadu23 (talk) 08:08, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and the user not editing appropriately to source material; the user is already known for nonconstructive edits according to their contribution history Junsik1223 (talk) 12:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated additions of contentious, dubious sourced material to a BLP. Edit warring. Adakiko (talk) 13:07, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 15:05, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very high profile subject, and the diffs here: [1] show that there has been high level of disruptive editing, and some edits are unsourced, vandalism, or both or, on some occasions removing references/content without explaining why or for no good reason whatsoever. Require Auto Confirmed access, at least 1-3 months, I would be against it being indefinite considering the subject is high profile. I also wouldn’t be against requiring Extended Confirmed access for a few months or indefinitely, or applying indefinite protection that starts with 30/500 protection which gets reduced to 4/10 protection later. Servite et contribuere (talk) 16:47, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There has been further vandalism since this request here: [2]. The user who vandalized the page has since been blocked, but I still figure protection is justified (Possibly even more justified now) due to the reasons I have provided above. Servite et contribuere (talk) 04:07, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Extended confirmed or pending changes due to continuous addition of unsourced content by multiple editors 10mmsocket (talk) 21:33, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that all of these pages get upgraded to the highest level of edit protection especially ones related to the allegations due to the contentious nature & stature of Michael Jackson. As all of his pages are prone to vandalism, editing wars & just recently new accounts made 2 days ago & a week or two ago took to the trial page to vandalize it with a large string of edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Never17 (talk • contribs) 09:07, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. The edits to the trial article are not vandalism but part of a content dispute and are being discussed at Talk:Trial of Michael Jackson#”Timeline” – POV and tone section templates. Favonian (talk) 16:17, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:18, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Articles is related to the October 7 attacks and Arab-Israeli conflict Teatreez (talk) 12:48, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High profile advocacy of subject deals with Jewish identity and Israel, article has already been vandalized. Teatreez (talk) 12:49, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:55, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extended-confirmed protection: Vandalism by autoconfirmed accounts on Friday DudeJay17 (talk) 15:26, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

+1 the vast majority of edits to the article in the last few months have been vandalism or otherwise unconstructive. ^LaffyTaffer 💬(she/they) 18:53, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations by multiple TAs; several are blocked but others continue. General Ization ^Talk 16:58, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very sensitive topic with a history of vandalism and a hotspot for baseless claims. Recently, a persistent vandal with multiple accounts (check Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents#User:Finnashz and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arsi786) was acting very unconstructive until they got banned. 1337.d4nd135 (talk) 17:25, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/DTHD disruption again. Can it get indef semi? SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 18:04, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/DTHD again. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 18:06, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism Delyan Peevski (talk) 18:53, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply