User talk:Afheather: Difference between revisions

Welcome!

Hello, Afheather, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!–Biografer (talk) 01:03, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Elizium23. I noticed that you recently removed content from Fictional world of The Hunger Games without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 03:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Natalie Dormer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Bradley. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Glenn Shadix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ER.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hope this isn’t too weird of a thing to do, but I’ve been following the ANI thread you commented in. Your comment seemed like an important point, but it might get lost in the conversation since right now it’s in between two much older posts. It might be a good idea to move it to the end? Apologies if that was intentional! CarringtonMist (talk) 21:22, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all, thanks for the suggestion! Done. I have no dog in the fight other than the absolute mess he’s made of this (and that he’s now apparently stalking me by editing the pages after I did). It’s the sheer number and the fact that they are wrong. Qualifications doesn’t count as an event, only team, individual all around, and apparatus finals do. Afheather (talk) 21:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it’s cute; you’re kind. Best wishes.–Titanicophile (talk) 08:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heather. I saw your thank you message. I should really have asked you first before moving the content, but it had lost context where it was, so I thought it should go to the main discussion part of the thread. I hope that’s okay. Let me know if I can help with anything. All the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 14:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I’m still learning how those pages work, so if I make a mistake like that, please feel free to correct it. Thanks! Afheather (talk) 14:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the “prompt me when entering a blank edit summary” box in your preferences. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 08:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Afheather. I left you the note above because I was alerted by this edit which I could not understand. You reintroduced material from The Sun. You undid some important changes like adding an author link and correcting two URLs. Why would you do that? Maybe there is a good reason behind it, but without an edit summary we can’t tell. Please always leave an edit summary. Happy editing! —Muhandes (talk) 08:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure why the material from the Sun was readded. The term for people from the US is American, not US-American, which was the change I was making. No other article refers to Americans as US-Americans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afheather (talk • contribs) 09:20, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that’s a good edit, I redid it. Not sure how, but you somehow reverted the article to some very old version. —Muhandes (talk) 19:31, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please stop reverting sourced content – I have no idea why you are doing this. The WP:BURDEN is with you to provide a reliable source in these instances. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have no clue how gymnastics qualifications works. You’re just pissed because I’ve been correcting your longstanding errors. Frankly, I bet the vast majority of them do not pass general notability guidelines. Afheather (talk) 13:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here, here’s your source for the 1996 Olympics. https://web.archive.org/web/20120628190838/http://www.gymnasticsresults.com/olympics/og1996wag.html
Quit following me around when I’m fixing your mistakes.

Thanks for the correction. I thought mom died, not daughter. Denmarkforever (talk) 02:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Laterthanyouthink. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tony Briggs, but you didn’t provide a reliable source. It’s been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 22:04, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Still Gotta Mean Something, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Chen.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Impact events in fiction, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:42, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]