[[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 07:12, 3 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>
[[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 07:12, 3 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>
:And a comment from another editor here: @[[User:MouseUnderYourSink|MouseUnderYourSink]] – I remember this group from the first time around. The book by Giles Smith can be mined for more information, I feel, but I’m sure I remember coverage in NME or RM or similar. So I suspect with some digging notability can be established. That said it may be realistic to expand Newall’s piece (?) [[User:ChrysGalley|ChrysGalley]] ([[User talk:ChrysGalley|talk]]) 09:25, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Hello, MouseUnderYourSink. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Cleaners From Venus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, MouseUnderYourSink. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, “The Cleaners From Venus“.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:29, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
|
Hello, MouseUnderYourSink!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley (talk / contribs) 23:11, 2 December 2025 (UTC) |
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: The comment the reviewer left was:
Most of this doesn’t have any footnotes – if you put in footnotes to the sources you got the information from, that will help. But it’s going to be tough to show that a band notable for its obscurity is, well, notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- And a comment from another editor here: @MouseUnderYourSink – I remember this group from the first time around. The book by Giles Smith can be mined for more information, I feel, but I’m sure I remember coverage in NME or RM or similar. So I suspect with some digging notability can be established. That said it may be realistic to expand Newall’s piece (?) ChrysGalley (talk) 09:25, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
