Small populations are also more vulnerable to [[genetic drift]], which leads to less and/or random fixation of [[Allele|alleles]]. As a result, this leads to higher levels of homozygosity and negatively affects individual fitness. The effectiveness of natural selection may be compromised as well, harming the performance of a species by allowing deleterious mutations to accumulate in these small populations. Because individuals in the small populations are more likely to be related, the likelihood of inbreeding also rises. Over time, the evolutionary potential of a species–and its ability to adapt to environmental changes, such as climate change–is decreased. Limited [[gene flow]] further constrains adaptation and can increase a species’ susceptibility to extinction.
Small populations are also more vulnerable to [[genetic drift]], which leads to less and/or random fixation of [[Allele|alleles]]. As a result, this leads to higher levels of homozygosity and negatively affects individual fitness. The effectiveness of natural selection may be compromised as well, harming the performance of a species by allowing deleterious mutations to accumulate in these small populations. Because individuals in the small populations are more likely to be related, the likelihood of inbreeding also rises. Over time, the evolutionary potential of a species–and its ability to adapt to environmental changes, such as climate change–is decreased. Limited [[gene flow]] further constrains adaptation and can increase a species’ susceptibility to extinction.
Depending on how severely fragmented a population is, the resulting genetic impacts will differ in severity. If a population is split into many, equal-sized populations, gene flow may be equal among all the populations. In other cases, movement of individuals and their genes may occur mostly between nearby fragmented populations, replicating a linear, stepping-stone-like design. This creates an uneven dispersal of genetic information across the broader range. More complex population arrangements, may mirror a [[Source–sink dynamics|source-sink dynamic]], where a larger population serves as a source for a large number of small populations. In cases of significantly isolated fragmented populations, they may experience little to no gene flow, increasing their susceptibility to extinction. Overall, genetic consequences depend on how easily individuals can move among fragments and how consistently genes are exchanged over time.
While population bottlenecks resulting from fragmentation are generally expected to lower genetic diversity over time, some species experiencing these conditions are nevertheless able to maintain relatively high levels of genetic diversity. Fragmentation into multiple, smaller subpopulations, particularly when gene flow is low, can adequately preserve allelic richness–the number of alleles present in a population–although often at the expense of [[Loss of heterozygosity|reduced heterozygosity]].
While population bottlenecks resulting from fragmentation are generally expected to lower genetic diversity over time, some species experiencing these conditions are nevertheless able to maintain relatively high levels of genetic diversity. Fragmentation into multiple, smaller subpopulations, particularly when gene flow is low, can adequately preserve allelic richness–the number of alleles present in a population–although often at the expense of [[Loss of heterozygosity|reduced heterozygosity]].
Population fragmentation caused by habitat fragmentation has also been shown to increase genetic differentiation among subpopulations, as there is less gene flow due to physical separation.
Population fragmentation caused by habitat fragmentation has also been shown to increase genetic differentiation among subpopulations, as there is less gene flow due to physical separation.
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org sandbox}}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org sandbox}}
For the article, Population fragmentation:
I plan on expanding the first section of the article, further defining what population fragmentation is independently of habitat fragmentation.
- Explore governmental sources, ScienceDirect, Minerva Center, Nature.com
I also plan on expanding the Proposed Conservation Solutions section, reorganizing and adding more specific information about wildlife corridors.
- Edit the information currently in the Proposed Conservation Solutions section
- Create a new section, Mitigation Methods, to discern what solutions are being explored and how
- Information about specific wildlife corridors (using sources already found during project 2)
I will be incorporating more sources throughout the article.
- Expanding on source already included in the article: “Population fragmentation leads to isolation by distance but not genetic impoverishment in the philopatric Lesser Kestrel: a comparison with the widespread and sympatric Eurasian Kestrel”
- Possibly adding more information from already cited book: Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance (6th ed.)
- Exploring other related books
- Finding and adding new relevant sources as necessary
Introductory section:
Population fragmentation is a form of population segregation [1]. It is a biological consequence of habitat fragmentation in which a population is divided into smaller, isolated groups due to physical separation, leading to genetic drift and inbreeding [13].
Causes
Population fragmentation is characterized by habitat loss and degradation, leading to a decrease in population size and connectivity. This degradation can be caused by natural forces or, especially in modern times, anthropogenic factors. General causes of this fragmentation include:
- The development of land around a protected area, even through the addition of a single road lane or fence line.
- The captivity, capture or killing of species in an area that links populations.
- The movement of a population away from other individuals of that species, such as the natural introduction of wolves and moose on Isle Royale.
- Geologic processes, such as landslides or volcanoes, dividing a habitat.
- Rising sea levels separating islands from what was once a common landmass.
- Global warming, especially when coupled with mountains, reducing movement from one habitat to another.
Genetic Effects
The consequences of population fragmentation are mostly genetic, contributing to various effects such as inbreeding depression, which leads to reduced genetic variability within fragmented populations. This reduction in variability decreases population fitness for several reasons. First, inbreeding increases competition among closely related individuals, lowering the evolutionary fitness of the species as a whole. Second, reduced genetic variability increases the likelihood that lethal homozygous recessive traits will be expressed, which can decrease average litter size and further reduce population size.
Small populations are also more vulnerable to genetic drift, which leads to less and/or random fixation of alleles. As a result, this leads to higher levels of homozygosity and negatively affects individual fitness. The effectiveness of natural selection may be compromised as well, harming the performance of a species by allowing deleterious mutations to accumulate in these small populations. Because individuals in the small populations are more likely to be related, the likelihood of inbreeding also rises. Over time, the evolutionary potential of a species–and its ability to adapt to environmental changes, such as climate change–is decreased. Limited gene flow further constrains adaptation and can increase a species’ susceptibility to extinction.
Depending on how severely fragmented a population is, the resulting genetic impacts will differ in severity. If a population is split into many, equal-sized populations, gene flow may be equal among all the populations. In other cases, movement of individuals and their genes may occur mostly between nearby fragmented populations, replicating a linear, stepping-stone-like design. This creates an uneven dispersal of genetic information across the broader range. More complex population arrangements, may mirror a source-sink dynamic, where a larger population serves as a source for a large number of small populations. In cases of significantly isolated fragmented populations, they may experience little to no gene flow, increasing their susceptibility to extinction. Overall, genetic consequences depend on how easily individuals can move among fragments and how consistently genes are exchanged over time.
While population bottlenecks resulting from fragmentation are generally expected to lower genetic diversity over time, some species experiencing these conditions are nevertheless able to maintain relatively high levels of genetic diversity. Fragmentation into multiple, smaller subpopulations, particularly when gene flow is low, can adequately preserve allelic richness–the number of alleles present in a population–although often at the expense of reduced heterozygosity.
Population fragmentation caused by habitat fragmentation has also been shown to increase genetic differentiation among subpopulations, as there is less gene flow due to physical separation.
 |
This is a user sandbox of NeverNeu. You can use it for testing or practicing edits.
This is not the place where you work on your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. Visit your Dashboard course page and follow the links for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
