User talk:Panthera99: Difference between revisions

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Battle of Stalingrad, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 12:22, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Panthera99! I noticed that you’ve made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of Battle of Stalingrad. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you’re aware of Wikipedia’s edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you’re doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Battle of Stalingrad, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors’ changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. Pyrrhic victor (talk) 13:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you’ve made to Battle of Stalingrad. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article’s talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. If I see you two edit warring again I will report you both to AN3. Pyrrhic victor (talk) 17:15, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]