:@[[User:Snokalok|Snokalok]] it’s not in reference to the LWN. It say “”’Labour Women’s Conference”'” which is the title of the conference itself. You’re making an [[WP:OR]] claim to suggest that LWN and the conference are the same. [[User:Rambling Rambler|Rambling Rambler]] ([[User talk:Rambling Rambler|talk]]) 14:14, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Snokalok|Snokalok]] it’s not in reference to the LWN. It say “”’Labour Women’s Conference”'” which is the title of the conference itself. You’re making an [[WP:OR]] claim to suggest that LWN and the conference are the same. [[User:Rambling Rambler|Rambling Rambler]] ([[User talk:Rambling Rambler|talk]]) 14:14, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
::No, it says’s ”’Labour Women”’’s conference. Labour Women. That’s the LWN. Anyway, you reverted it so I’m happy to continue the convo. But I do wish to note that that IP has been following me to every article and reverting anything I do, and he’s been banned several times for vandalism, socking, slurs in personal attacks, and hounding. Your revert is fair and I will discuss it here before reinstating. Anything he does in regards to my edits, I will continue to revert as is allowed towards ban evaders. [[User:Snokalok|Snokalok]] ([[User talk:Snokalok|talk]]) 14:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
::No, it says’s ”’Labour Women”’’s conference. Labour Women. That’s the LWN. Anyway, you reverted it so I’m happy to continue the convo. But I do wish to note that that IP has been following me to every article and reverting anything I do, and he’s been banned several times for vandalism, socking, slurs in personal attacks, and hounding. Your revert is fair and I will discuss it here before reinstating. Anything he does in regards to my edits, I will continue to revert as is allowed towards ban evaders. [[User:Snokalok|Snokalok]] ([[User talk:Snokalok|talk]]) 14:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
:No it’s not the same. Labour Women’s Conference =/= Lanour Women’s Network.
:The women’s conference is not organised cy the LWN, it’s organised by the Labour NEC and the WCAC. LWN is not mwntioned in ewither of the cited sources, and nor is it mentioned in the orginal Labour .list source that they draw from. {https://labourlist.org/2025/05/labour-women-policy-conference-shortlists-all-trans-rights-sex/}. This information does not belong in this article
:::@[[User:Snokalok|Snokalok]] Labour Women’s Network ”’is not”’ Labour Women’s Conference in the same way it’s ”’also not”’ Labour Women’s Declaration.
:::@[[User:Snokalok|Snokalok]] Labour Women’s Network ”’is not”’ Labour Women’s Conference in the same way it’s ”’also not”’ Labour Women’s Declaration.
:::Multiple groups use the words Labour Women’s, and it is [[WP:OR]] for you to claim it must mean LWN when neither source states LWN at any point. [[User:Rambling Rambler|Rambling Rambler]] ([[User talk:Rambling Rambler|talk]]) 14:24, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
:::Multiple groups use the words Labour Women’s, and it is [[WP:OR]] for you to claim it must mean LWN when neither source states LWN at any point. [[User:Rambling Rambler|Rambling Rambler]] ([[User talk:Rambling Rambler|talk]]) 14:24, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
|
||||||
LWN isn’t a political party in itself, so the wrong infobox is in use in this article. PamD 07:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
@Rambling Rambler The BBC source says “Labour Women’s” with proper caps. That’s the Labour Women’s Network. They’re not going to say LWN every time Snokalok (talk) 14:11, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Snokalok it’s not in reference to the LWN. It say “Labour Women’s Conference” which is the title of the conference itself. You’re making an WP:OR claim to suggest that LWN and the conference are the same. Rambling Rambler (talk) 14:14, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- No, it says’s Labour Women’s conference. Labour Women. That’s the LWN. Anyway, you reverted it so I’m happy to continue the convo. But I do wish to note that that IP has been following me to every article and reverting anything I do, and he’s been banned several times for vandalism, socking, slurs in personal attacks, and hounding. Your revert is fair and I will discuss it here before reinstating. Anything he does in regards to my edits, I will continue to revert as is allowed towards ban evaders. Snokalok (talk) 14:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- The IP’s (now deleted) comment is fair, I will not challenge your revert Snokalok (talk) 14:21, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Snokalok Labour Women’s Network is not Labour Women’s Conference in the same way it’s also not Labour Women’s Declaration.
- Multiple groups use the words Labour Women’s, and it is WP:OR for you to claim it must mean LWN when neither source states LWN at any point. Rambling Rambler (talk) 14:24, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- See the above comment, I said I wouldn’t challenge your revert per the IP’s point Snokalok (talk) 14:25, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- No, it says’s Labour Women’s conference. Labour Women. That’s the LWN. Anyway, you reverted it so I’m happy to continue the convo. But I do wish to note that that IP has been following me to every article and reverting anything I do, and he’s been banned several times for vandalism, socking, slurs in personal attacks, and hounding. Your revert is fair and I will discuss it here before reinstating. Anything he does in regards to my edits, I will continue to revert as is allowed towards ban evaders. Snokalok (talk) 14:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)


