User talk:Braidnomad25: Difference between revisions

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Braidnomad25! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:04, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I noticed you’ve submitted a couple drafts regarding Nova Scotia-related topics. NGOs are generally quite difficult to prove to be notable, in that they typically don’t receive much secondary coverage unless they’ve been around for a long time. You may have a better time working at expanding some pre-existing articles. See for example Category:Energy in Nova Scotia. If you’d like to collaborate, I invite you to check out WikiProject Nova Scotia. If you have any questions let me know. All the best, MediaKyle (talk) 14:27, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Braidnomad25. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nova Scotia Energy and Regulatory Boards Tribunal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Braidnomad25. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nova Scotia Energy Board, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Braidnomad25. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, “Nova Scotia Energy and Regulatory Boards Tribunal“.

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Braidnomad25. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, “Nova Scotia Energy Board“.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:05, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]