User talk:Gottagitgud: Difference between revisions

 

Line 87: Line 87:

==Repeated deletion of well-sourced material==

==Repeated deletion of well-sourced material==

A thread has been opened at [[WP:FTN]] about your recent behavior. The proper procedure is for you to self-revert your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_Smith_and_the_criminal_justice_system&diff=prev&oldid=1326424257 deletion] and instead build a consensus for the change. [[User:Feoffer|Feoffer]] ([[User talk:Feoffer|talk]]) 02:29, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

A thread has been opened at [[WP:FTN]] about your recent behavior. The proper procedure is for you to self-revert your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_Smith_and_the_criminal_justice_system&diff=prev&oldid=1326424257 deletion] and instead build a consensus for the change. [[User:Feoffer|Feoffer]] ([[User talk:Feoffer|talk]]) 02:29, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

:You’re wrong on the facts. Your angry reaction is only natural, but your personal attacks are unacceptable. After the dust settles you owe Epachamo an apology. [[User:Gottagitgud|Gottagitgud]] ([[User talk:Gottagitgud#top|talk]]) 02:01, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:
 The comment the reviewer left was:

In addition to some neutrality concerns, there are substantial structural manual of style issues. However, this is an admirable attempt at a first article and I highly encourage building this further. I’ll keep my eye on this—looking forward to approving it with some improvements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Pbritti (talk) 03:30, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse logo
Hello, Gottagitgud!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbritti (talk) 03:30, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Expulsion of Mormons from Jackson County, Missouri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pbritti (talk) 17:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1838 Mormon War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caldwell County. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I’m pleased to inform you that I’ve begun reviewing the article 1838 Mormon War you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Penultimate supperPenultimate supper (talk) 16:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Penultimate supper. Thank you for taking the time to review my nomination! This is an article with a rich history going back to 2004, and I am eager to collaborate with you and find ways it can be improved. Best regards. Gottagitgud (talk) 05:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gottagitgud: Hi! I’ve dived in a bit already, apologies it’s taking me a bit longer to get initial comments to you than I thought, I have unexpected family visitors so my life got a bit more chaotic than expected. I’m working on reviewing citations at the minute and should have some initial comments of the article as well as a thorough citation review for you soon. It’s a lovely article so far! — penultimate_supper 🚀 (talkcontribs) 13:13, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi; User:Gottagitgud, would you like me to extend the hold on Talk:1838 Mormon War/GA1? I see you’ve been working in-depth on the article in a userspace draft—making some significant improvements—so I don’t doubt the article will readily meet all the GA criteria soon. I’m happy to extend the hold for a while (maybe till 2024-12-16?) to support that work. Also, please communicate if there are any issues I raised or suggestions I made that you don’t agree with; I’m just one reviewer and unless something is a major violation of the criteria, reasonable editors can have different views about what will lead to the strongest article—which is all that really matters in the end. Cheers! — penultimate_supper 🚀 (talkcontribs) 16:11, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1838 Mormon War you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:1838 Mormon War for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Penultimate supperPenultimate supper (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A thread has been opened at WP:FTN about your recent behavior. The proper procedure is for you to self-revert your deletion and instead build a consensus for the change. Feoffer (talk) 02:29, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You’re wrong on the facts. Your angry reaction is only natural, but your personal attacks are unacceptable. After the dust settles you owe Epachamo an apology. Gottagitgud (talk) 02:01, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top