User talk:Misterpotatoman: Difference between revisions

suggestion levels are now removed as if you think a suggestion is to hard or easy you just disable them from appearing, there’s drop-down boxes represented by arrows in the change which suggestions appear, copy edit is now split in 2 different options, copyedit is now only for grammar correction and sentence restructuring while still getting the same meaning across and it’s split half becomes neutralize articles which is the highest easy task, copyedit gets a dropdown arrow splitting it into edit article short description and grammar correction, add references have down box for cite sources (add cites to citeless parts) and add cites (added cites to already cited parts that need more), and there should be new medium task called add image where you add a image to a article, there should be a separate article into sections button where you separate lengthy parts into different sections or subsections, the expand short articles should get a dropdown arrow and be renamed to expand articles, it would have expand short articles (expand articles that lack a lot of information) and expand articles (expand articles that already have alot of information but could use more) and add section which is for specifically adding a entire section, now there should be a list of things that need a article but don’t have one, there would be a suggestion called reform drafts where reform drafts that could be good articles if edited and you have to edit it until it’s acceptable, this would work if the draft maker agrees to let other people edit they’re draft and the guy who disapproved has to say if it is reformable, the creator and secondary editor could work together in this potentially, there should also be a suggestion to make a article Misterpotatoman (talk) 00:54, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That’s a lot to say in just one sentence. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:30, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what does this mean? Misterpotatoman (talk) 02:07, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you need to speak with others, use their Talk page – do not edit other people’s user pages, as you did at User:AsyaShubina. Jessicapierce (talk) 06:52, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 06:52, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]