From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|
””’Jotedars””’, also known as ”’Hawladars”’, ”’Ganitdars”’, ”’Jwaddars”’ or ”[[Mandals]]”, were landlords or well-to-do ”ryots” or wealthy peasants who exercised control and influence comparable to that of a [[Zamindars]] but were perceived as significantly below them in [[social stratification|social strata]] in agrarian [[Bengal Presidency|Bengal]] during [[Company rule in India]]. |
””’Jotedars””’, also known as ”’Hawladars”’, ”’Ganitdars”’, ”’Jwaddars”’ or ”[[Mandals]]”, were landlords or well-to-do ”ryots” or wealthy peasants who exercised control and influence comparable to that of a [[Zamindars]] but were perceived as significantly below them in [[social stratification|social strata]] in agrarian [[Bengal Presidency|Bengal]] during [[Company rule in India]]. |
||
|
Jotedars owned relatively extensive tracts of [[land]], and their [[land tenure]] status stood in contrast to those of poor ”ryots” and [[bargadars]] (sharecroppers), who were landless or land-poor. Most of the [[Hindu]] ”Jotedars” in [[West Bengal]] were from the ”[[Bhadralok]]” community, members of Hindu upper castes of [[Bengal]] such as ”[[Kayastha]]”, ”[[Brahmin]]” etc. Many [[Muslim]] ”Jotedars” were from an ”[[Sharif|Ashraf]]” or ”Khandani” family background and were in the elite nobility of [[Bengali Muslims]] who descended from settled foreigners such as the [[Pashtuns|Afghans]], [[Mughal people|Mughals]], [[Arabs]], [[Persians]], [[Turkic peoples|Turks]] and [[Delhi|North Indian]] immigrants. The socially high-standing Hindu and Muslim ”Jotedars”, who were not actually peasants, had adopted the ”de jure” status of ”[[ryot]]” (peasant) solely for financial benefiting from the [[Bengal Tenancy Act (1885)|Bengal Tenancy Act of 1885]] afforded to ryots and for the claim that ”Jotedars” had more freedom and powers than Zamindars. |
Jotedars owned relatively extensive tracts of [[land]], and their [[land tenure]] status stood in contrast to those of poor ”ryots” and [[bargadars]] (sharecroppers), who were landless or land-poor. Most of the [[Hindu]] ”Jotedars” in [[West Bengal]] were from the ”[[Bhadralok]]” community, members of Hindu upper castes of [[Bengal]] such as ”[[Kayastha]]”, ”[[Brahmin]]” etc. Many [[Muslim]] ”Jotedars” were from an ”[[Sharif|Ashraf]]” or ”Khandani” family background and were in the elite nobility of [[Bengali Muslims]] who descended from settled foreigners such as the [[Pashtuns|Afghans]], [[Mughal people|Mughals]], [[Arabs]], [[Persians]], [[Turkic peoples|Turks]] and [[Delhi|North Indian]] immigrants. The socially high-standing Hindu and Muslim ”Jotedars”, who were not actually peasants, had adopted the ”de jure” status of ”[[ryot]]” (peasant) solely for financial benefiting from the [[Bengal Tenancy Act (1885)|Bengal Tenancy Act of 1885]] afforded to ryots and for the claim that ”Jotedars” had more freedom and powers than Zamindars. |
||
|
Others belonged to the intermediate landowning peasant castes, such as [[Sadgop|”Sadgops”]], [[Aguri (caste)|”Aguris”]], [[Mahishya|”Mahishyas”]], [[Rajbongshi people|”Rajbongshis”]], ”[[Shershahabadia]]” and the rural less-educated [[Brahmin|”Brahmins”]].<ref name=”:0″ /> By the 1920s, a gentrified fraction of Jotedars had emerged from the more prosperous peasants among the tribes such as [[Santhal people|”Santhals”]] and the Scheduled Castes such as the ”[[Bagdi]]” and the [[Namasudra|”Namasudras”]]<ref name=”:0″>{{Cite book |last=Iqbal |first=I. |year=2010 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gYslngEACAAJ |title=The Bengal Delta: Ecology, State and Social Change, 1840-1943 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |page=107 |isbn=978-0-230-23183-2}}</ref> |
Others belonged to the intermediate landowning peasant castes, such as [[Sadgop|”Sadgops”]], [[Aguri (caste)|”Aguris”]], [[Mahishya|”Mahishyas”]], [[Rajbongshi people|”Rajbongshis”]], ”[[Shershahabadia]]” and the rural less-educated [[Brahmin|”Brahmins”]].<ref name=”:0″ /> By the 1920s, a gentrified fraction of Jotedars had emerged from the more prosperous peasants among the tribes such as [[Santhal people|”Santhals”]] and the Scheduled Castes such as the ”[[Bagdi]]” and the [[Namasudra|”Namasudras”]]<ref name=”:0″>{{Cite book |last=Iqbal |first=I. |year=2010 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gYslngEACAAJ |title=The Bengal Delta: Ecology, State and Social Change, 1840-1943 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |page=107 |isbn=978-0-230-23183-2}}</ref> |
||
Latest revision as of 11:15, 13 December 2025
Bengal hereditary aristocrat
Jotedars, also known as Hawladars, Ganitdars, Jwaddars or Mandals, were landlords or well-to-do ryots or wealthy peasants who exercised control and influence comparable to that of a Zamindars but were perceived as significantly below them in social strata in agrarian Bengal during Company rule in India.
Jotedars owned relatively extensive tracts of land, and their land tenure status stood in contrast to those of poor ryots and bargadars (sharecroppers), who were landless or land-poor. Most of the Hindu Jotedars in West Bengal were from the Bhadralok community, members of Hindu upper castes of Bengal such as Kayastha, Brahmin, Mahishya etc. Many Muslim Jotedars were from an Ashraf or Khandani family background and were in the elite nobility of Bengali Muslims who descended from settled foreigners such as the Afghans, Mughals, Arabs, Persians, Turks and North Indian immigrants. The socially high-standing Hindu and Muslim Jotedars, who were not actually peasants, had adopted the de jure status of ryot (peasant) solely for financial benefiting from the Bengal Tenancy Act of 1885 afforded to ryots and for the claim that Jotedars had more freedom and powers than Zamindars.
Others belonged to the intermediate landowning peasant castes, such as Sadgops, Aguris, Mahishyas, Rajbongshis, Shershahabadia and the rural less-educated Brahmins.[1] By the 1920s, a gentrified fraction of Jotedars had emerged from the more prosperous peasants among the tribes such as Santhals and the Scheduled Castes such as the Bagdi and the Namasudras[1]
Jotedars were long in actual control of the village land and economy[2] and were pitted against in the Naxalite movement.[3][4]
