Template:Did you know nominations/Agastya lake: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 60: Line 60:

::::{{yo|Earth605}} Not quite. The issue remains that there’s not a single reliable source which says that this Agastya lake is the Agastya’s lake mentioned in the Mahabharata. -[[User:AmateurHi$torian|AmateurHi$torian]] ([[User talk:AmateurHi$torian|talk]]) 19:40, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

::::{{yo|Earth605}} Not quite. The issue remains that there’s not a single reliable source which says that this Agastya lake is the Agastya’s lake mentioned in the Mahabharata. -[[User:AmateurHi$torian|AmateurHi$torian]] ([[User talk:AmateurHi$torian|talk]]) 19:40, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

:::::{{ping|Earth605}} Please respond to the above. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|<B><span style=”color:#0038A8″>Naruto</span><span style=”color:#FCD116″>love</span><span style=”color:#CE1126″>hinata</span>5</B>]] ([[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|contributions]]) 06:37, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

:::::{{ping|Earth605}} Please respond to the above. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|<B><span style=”color:#0038A8″>Naruto</span><span style=”color:#FCD116″>love</span><span style=”color:#CE1126″>hinata</span>5</B>]] ([[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|contributions]]) 06:37, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

::::::There is literally one lake in all of the world with this name. There is no doubt it is the same lake. [[User:Earth605|<span style=”color:green;”>Earth605</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Earth605|talk]]</sup> 07:27, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

}}<!–Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.–>

}}<!–Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.–>


Latest revision as of 07:27, 15 December 2025

Agastya lake

Moved to mainspace by Earth605 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Earth605talk 18:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC).

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No – The source provided is myholidayhappiness.com
  • Interesting: Yes

Overall: @Earth605: New enough, long enough. Neutral in tone. QPQ not required. Presentability is an issue since the article is filled with single-sentence paragraphs. Sourcing is also an issue. Since the lake was built in the early medieval period, and is surrounded by the Badami cave temples, it should have some mention in academic sources. AmateurHi$torian (talk) 09:06, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

The article states, “It is not known how was the lake built”. However, this source states that “Bâdami is situated at the outlet between two rocky hills on its north and south-east sides, a dam to the east of the town between the bases of the hills forming a large tank for the supply of water to the town”. So, it’s quite clear how the lake was built. –AmateurHi$torian (talk) 09:17, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

I have substituted unreliable refs, added your ref and provided a new ref for the hook. I have also fixed issues with presentation. @AmateurHi$torian: What do you think now? Earth605talk 07:07, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Many unreliable sources still persist. These are:
1. yatrikaone.com
2. “Some Whispers from Eternity: Book on Evolution of Consciousness and Upliftment of Humanity Through OM Kriya Yoga” by Shomik Chaudhuri.
3. www.sterlingholidays.com
4. www.avathi.com
5. myholidayhappiness.com
Please do familiarize yourself with WP:RS (particularly WP:SOURCETYPES and WP:RSSELF). Since this article is about a lake built in the 7th century and surrounded by medieval temples, cave temples, and other historic buildings, the best sources for this topic would be published articles/books by historians/archaeologists. Other sources, such as news articles are also acceptable, especially for the part about recent flooding, which wouldn’t appear in any history books, for example (“The Hindu” is considered very reliable, The Times of India less so but it depends on context).
The problem with the sources I’ve mentioned is that anyone can create a blog or write a book. That says nothing for the validity of these sources.
Furthermore, the Mahabharata does mention one Agastya’s lake, but it is most likely not this one, since this one was built a few centuries after the compilation of the Mahabharata. –AmateurHi$torian (talk) 11:14, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

There might be a local folk/mythological belief that this lake is the one mentioned in the Mahabharata, and that it was built by Agastya himself. That can be included in the article. But the problem is, there has to be a source for this. –AmateurHi$torian (talk) 11:22, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
@Earth605: Please address the above. And yes, this should be at Agastya Lake per MOS:GEOCAPS.–Launchballer 13:10, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Moved. Thank! All issues have been solved. Can somebody give a tick? @Launchballer, Narutolovehinata5, and AmateurHi$torian:. Earth605talk 15:03, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

@Earth605: Not quite. The issue remains that there’s not a single reliable source which says that this Agastya lake is the Agastya’s lake mentioned in the Mahabharata. –AmateurHi$torian (talk) 19:40, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

@Earth605: Please respond to the above. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:37, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

There is literally one lake in all of the world with this name. There is no doubt it is the same lake. Earth605talk 07:27, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top