User talk:LilyRosewiki.writer: Difference between revisions

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

We’re sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn’t showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:01, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LilyRosewiki.writer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:01, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LilyRosewiki.writer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello. I accept that I made a mistake by using multiple accounts, and I understand why I was blocked.

I apologize for this behavior. I did not fully understand the rules at that time, but now I clearly understand that

sockpuppetry is not allowed on Wikipedia.

I promise that I will follow all Wikipedia policies from now on and I will use only ONE account.

I want to contribute positively and respectfully without breaking any rules again.

Please consider giving me one more chance. Thank you.

Decline reason:

We don’t unblock sock accounts, you need to go back to your original master account and appeal from there. And, I might add, you’ll need to do a lot better than just saying “sorry, I won’t do it again”. I suggest you also address the promotional and likely undisclosed paid editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:44, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LilyRosewiki.writer (talk) 11:22, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am appealing from my original account. I admit that I violated Wikipedia’s sockpuppetry policy (WP:SOCK) by using multiple accounts. I understand now that this disrupts community trust and creates an unfair editing environment. I take full responsibility for this mistake and I will use only one account from now on – this one.

Regarding the promotional and possible undisclosed paid-editing concerns: I understand why my previous edits appeared promotional. At that time, I did not fully understand Wikipedia’s rules on WP:PAID and WP:COI, but I have now carefully read and understood them. I will not edit any topic where I may have a conflict of interest, and I will avoid anything that looks like promotional content. If I ever need to edit such topics, I will follow all disclosure requirements.

Please unblock my account. Thank you. LilyRosewiki.writer (talk) 10:20, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you saying this is your original account? Are you trying to tell us that the Sophiawiki.writer account, which is older, is not yours? Or that you’re not related to AryaanKhan056? Or both? — DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:34, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
I am writing to respectfully request a review of my indefinite block. I acknowledge and fully accept that I violated Wikipedia’s sockpuppetry policy by operating multiple accounts. This was a serious mistake on my part, and I understand how it undermines community trust and the integrity of the project.
I want to clearly state that I have permanently stopped using all other accounts connected to this investigation and will only edit from a single account if unblocked. I will not attempt to evade this block in any way.
Regarding concerns about promotional or paid editing: I understand now why some of my past edits appeared promotional. At the time, I lacked a proper understanding of Wikipedia’s neutral point of view and conflict-of-interest guidelines. I assure you that going forward I will strictly follow NPOV, COI, and paid-editing disclosure policies, and I will avoid editing any topics where I may have a conflict of interest.
I respectfully ask for one final chance to contribute constructively and transparently. If unblocked, I am willing to accept any reasonable restrictions or probationary conditions imposed by the community or administrators.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
LilyRosewiki.writer LilyRosewiki.writer (talk) 13:23, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]