From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|
:* ”’Propose deleting”’ {{lc|Lawsuits against the Devil}} |
:* ”’Propose deleting”’ {{lc|Lawsuits against the Devil}} |
||
|
:”’Nominator’s rationale:”’ The category has 1 article that actually fits the category and 3 fictional stories that are not lawsuits against the devil. [[User:PARAKANYAA|PARAKANYAA]] ([[User talk:PARAKANYAA|talk]]) 03:56, 19 December 2025 (UTC) |
:”’Nominator’s rationale:”’ The category has 1 article that actually fits the category and 3 fictional stories that are not lawsuits against the devil. [[User:PARAKANYAA|PARAKANYAA]] ([[User talk:PARAKANYAA|talk]]) 03:56, 19 December 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
* ”’Keep”’, but ”’Restructure”’. With reference to the similar [[:Category:Lawsuits against God]], I would argue for moving the fictional entries under a new sub-category [[:Category:Fictional lawsuits against the Devil]] for clarity. That would leave [[United States ex rel. Gerald Mayo v. Satan and His Staff]] and [[Lawsuits against supernatural beings]] as the only direct entries in the parent category. From skimming [[WP:CAT]], I note that there’s no policy against small categories per se. [[User:Cybercobra|<b><span style=”color: #3773A5;”>Cyber</span></b><span style=”color: #FFB521;”>cobra</span>]] [[User talk:Cybercobra|(talk)]] 04:25, 19 December 2025 (UTC) |
|||
|
==== Category:Film controversies ==== |
==== Category:Film controversies ==== |
||
Revision as of 04:25, 19 December 2025
December 19
NEW NOMINATIONS
Category:Lawsuits against the Devil
- Nominator’s rationale: The category has 1 article that actually fits the category and 3 fictional stories that are not lawsuits against the devil. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:56, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Category:Film controversies
- Nominator’s rationale: In an attempt to WP:DIFFUSE this category and its plethora of related subcats, I am proposing that this category be split up because it presently covers two scopes: matters of controversies related to films and films themselves which have endured said controversies. I have seen this category be added to many film articles when there is remotely a hint of controversial material present, but the category description indicates it is only for articles covering the controversies themselves. Sentiments for such a split and scope clarity were echoed in this 2020 CfD, for which the closer said “
There also appears to be consensus that articles about the films themselves should not be placed in this category.
” The goal of this proposal is to enact that consensus and avoid confusion regarding this category’s scope, and for this to also apply to the subcategories as warranted. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 03:46, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Category:19th-century Egyptian criminals
- Nominator’s rationale: upmerge for now. underpopulated category. I’ve been unable to find anyone else to populate the category. https://petscan.wmcloud.org/?psid=41476706 SMasonGarrison 00:53, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
