From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|
*<small class=”delsort-notice”>Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Andhra Pradesh|list of Andhra Pradesh-related deletion discussions]]. ”'[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style=”color:red”>WC</span>”<span style=”color:#999933″>Quidditch</span>”]]”’ [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style=”color:red”>☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style=”color:#999933″>✎</span>]] 00:05, 18 December 2025 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class=”delsort-notice”>Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Andhra Pradesh|list of Andhra Pradesh-related deletion discussions]]. ”'[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style=”color:red”>WC</span>”<span style=”color:#999933″>Quidditch</span>”]]”’ [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style=”color:red”>☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style=”color:#999933″>✎</span>]] 00:05, 18 December 2025 (UTC)</small> |
||
|
*”’Delete or redirect”’ per lack of notability. The content specific to this bank is only generic business genealogy and directory-type information. Much of the content is only about this type of bank, the parent organization, or the governmental systems under which it operates, or credulous/promotional material about its logo which is consistent with this specific bank not being independently notable and this article not being a viable one. [[Regional rural bank]] is the apparently-notable parent topic. See also [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punjab Gramin Bank]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aryavart Bank]] (closed conseneus “redirect” prior to this DR here being filed). [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 22:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC) |
*”’Delete or redirect”’ per lack of notability. The content specific to this bank is only generic business genealogy and directory-type information. Much of the content is only about this type of bank, the parent organization, or the governmental systems under which it operates, or credulous/promotional material about its logo which is consistent with this specific bank not being independently notable and this article not being a viable one. [[Regional rural bank]] is the apparently-notable parent topic. See also [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punjab Gramin Bank]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aryavart Bank]] (closed conseneus “redirect” prior to this DR here being filed). [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 22:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:”’Keep”’: A bank with ”’13 million+ customers and a network of 1351 branches”’ is likely to be independently notable! |
|||
|
:The article may needs to be rewritten and additional citations are required. But it is only seven months old. Coverage is poised to get bigger. No doubt the article is in terrible condition, but Wp:BEFORE indicates, it’s notable enough to have a stand-alone article. This Indian bank is supported by substantial coverage and meets the criteria of WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. The page views of the Article in the last month is more than 2.8K [[User:Ankit231132|Ankits]] ([[User talk:Ankit231132|talk]]) 12:43, 19 December 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:43, 19 December 2025
- Andhra Pradesh Grameena Bank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One of dozens of Regional rural banks recently created and/or updated with large amounts of WP:LLM text. Attempted to tag but that was removed with the claim they are not LLM-generated. Looking closer, the bank fails WP:NCORP regardless of AI text. The sources are all routine announcements or churnalism. I cannot locate the type of WP:CORPDEPTH needed to show notability. CNMall41 (talk) 21:03, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: A bank with 13 million+ customers and a network of 1351 branches is likely to be independently notable!
- The article may needs to be rewritten and additional citations are required. But it is only seven months old. Coverage is poised to get bigger. No doubt the article is in terrible condition, but Wp:BEFORE indicates, it’s notable enough to have a stand-alone article. This Indian bank is supported by substantial coverage and meets the criteria of WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. The page views of the Article in the last month is more than 2.8K Ankits (talk) 12:43, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
