User talk:Lakers96: Difference between revisions

Welcome to Wikipedia, Lakers96! I’m UtherSRG, and I’ve been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I’m here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I’m glad you’re here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It’s recommended that you take advantage of this, as it’ll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the “Get editing help” button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! UtherSRG (talk) 21:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m reaching out to note that a consensus had already been established on Social democracy, and an edit consistent with that consensus was implemented and acknowledged when page protection was removed.

Your recent revert appears to disregard that existing consensus and was made without establishing a new one. Please refrain from reverting consensus-backed edits without consensus on the talk page.

A Wikipedia Administrator had acknowledged this consensus when removing the page protection. Please see revision history. AnAnonymousUser222 (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you’ve made to Social Democracy. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article’s talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing.

You have again edited the article on social democracy against the most recent consensus. Please avoid edit warring and read the talk page before making any changes to the lede. Allmänbildare (talk) 20:35, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Social democracy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:30, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]