From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|
:”’Support”’ as involved. I think it has [[WP:NPOV]] issues and the title lacks [[WP:AGF]] and may inadvertently be used to badger editors to avoid admitting to LLM usage as the author did. I also have a big issue with some of the statements like{{tq|Generative AI has made people newly suspicious of too polished writing and robotic speech}} and {{Tq|When someone says another person sounds like AI, they usually mean one or more of the following cues}} which makes many assumptions. I agree with your assessment that it was likely one of several works by the author that was generated by AI. |
:”’Support”’ as involved. I think it has [[WP:NPOV]] issues and the title lacks [[WP:AGF]] and may inadvertently be used to badger editors to avoid admitting to LLM usage as the author did. I also have a big issue with some of the statements like{{tq|Generative AI has made people newly suspicious of too polished writing and robotic speech}} and {{Tq|When someone says another person sounds like AI, they usually mean one or more of the following cues}} which makes many assumptions. I agree with your assessment that it was likely one of several works by the author that was generated by AI. |
||
|
:Aside from that, it doesn’t really like an essay on how machination impacts neurodivergent people, it reads like something to divert attention from the fact that very many people do use LLMs improperly on Wikipedia, including the author. I think a good essay on this subject matter would include other machinated false-positives like Captchas that often trigger for neurodivergent people with inattentiveness as the rapid link opening in background tabs trips the algorithms as “suspicious” behavior. Whatever the subject matter should be, this isn’t it. [[User:Revolving Doormat|Revolving Doormat]] ([[User talk:Revolving Doormat|talk]]) 17:39, 21 December 2025 (UTC) |
:Aside from that, it doesn’t really like an essay on how machination impacts neurodivergent people, it reads like something to divert attention from the fact that very many people do use LLMs improperly on Wikipedia, including the author. I think a good essay on this subject matter would include other machinated false-positives like Captchas that often trigger for neurodivergent people with inattentiveness as the rapid link opening in background tabs trips the algorithms as “suspicious” behavior. Whatever the subject matter should be, this isn’t it. [[User:Revolving Doormat|Revolving Doormat]] ([[User talk:Revolving Doormat|talk]]) 17:39, 21 December 2025 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 17:40, 21 December 2025
- Wikipedia:Neurodivergent Voices and AI Assumptions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​
Boldly MfDing this per the ANI thread. This essay seems to have been created out of spite at Revolving Doormat [1]. I understand the subject of the essay, but it seems very much like AI, especially the level 1 header and title’s capitalization scheme, and I wouldn’t be surprised if it was – see [2]. It’s in projectspace now, and I don’t think it’s worthy of being here given the circumstances of its creation. HurricaneZetaC 15:48, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- Support as involved. I think it has WP:NPOV issues and the title lacks WP:AGF and may inadvertently be used to badger editors to avoid admitting to LLM usage as the author did. I also have a big issue with some of the statements like
Generative AI has made people newly suspicious of too polished writing and robotic speech
andWhen someone says another person sounds like AI, they usually mean one or more of the following cues
which makes many assumptions. I agree with your assessment that it was likely one of several works by the author that was generated by AI. - Aside from that, it doesn’t really read like an essay on how machination impacts neurodivergent people, it reads like something to divert attention from the fact that very many people do use LLMs improperly on Wikipedia, including the author. I think a good essay on this subject matter would include other machinated false-positives like Captchas that often trigger for neurodivergent people with inattentiveness as the rapid link opening in background tabs trips the algorithms as “suspicious” behavior. Whatever the subject matter should be, this isn’t it. Revolving Doormat (talk) 17:39, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
