User talk:Rsnbrgr: Difference between revisions

Welcome!

Hello, Rsnbrgr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! — Longhair\^talk 09:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Rsnbrgr! I’m glad that you are joining the November 2025 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 06:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I saw your edit to In the Open (1914 film) and wanted to give you a heads up the IMDb is not considered a reliable source per WP:IMDB. Vegantics (talk) 18:18, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I’ve erased the template on my computer, and now I’m (slowly) scrolling the Perennial sources for other citations I may have erred. Rob Rosenberger (talk) 08:19, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Undid my change, again thanks! Rob Rosenberger (talk) 08:45, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being thoughtful, good luck in your editing! Vegantics (talk) 14:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve reverted your addition to Verplanck Van Antwerp for the WP:NOV25 contest as Find a Grave is a user-generated source which is considered to be unreliable and should not be used as a source. Hog Farm _Talk 04:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! As I said to Vegantics… I’ve erased that template from my computer, and now I’m (slowly) scrolling the Perennial sources for other citations I may have erred. Please forgive me for not knowing about perennial before now. Rob Rosenberger (talk) 08:21, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

uses way to many primary sources for contestable/debatable facts, and primary to independent ratio is near nil.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 15:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rsnbrgr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 15:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]