User talk:Another Believer: Difference between revisions

By /

The 2025 WikiCup has come to an end. Our top scorers, based on the tournament point rankings (which can be seen here), are:

  1. Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,604 tournament points, will receive the 1st place award.
  2. English Island, South Australia Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,075 tournament points, will receive the 2nd place award.
  3. Arconning (submissions) with 860 tournament points, will receive the 3rd place award.
  4. Canada History6042 (submissions) with 804 tournament points
  5. Sammi Brie (submissions) with 635 tournament points
  6. Oklahoma TheDoctorWho (submissions) with 386 tournament points
  7. AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 373 tournament points
  8. Thebiguglyalien (submissions) with 362 tournament points

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:24, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Resolved

Hi, I’m trying to move Draft:Vezirja into the mainspace, but I don’t know how to do so when a redirect already occupies that article name. Cornmazes (talk) 23:19, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cornmazes  Done —Another Believer (Talk) 23:23, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Your substub Hoya alagensis doesn’t have a infobox or taxonbar. Why not? Abductive (reasoning) 19:09, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem, Liz, and OwenX: I give up. It is clear a constructive discussion cannot be had here. How disheartening, —Another Believer (Talk) 13:50, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think that’s a fair accusation. So far, you seem to be the only one who refuses to engage with others here, with your repeated “LEAVE ME ALONE!” comments. If you are willing to engage in a serious, level-headed debate about the subject, you can open an RfC at Talk:RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars, where the general notability of single episode and single contestant articles can be debated calmly, based on our guidelines, rather than on accusations of personal gripes. If you approach it that way, I have no doubt that Woodensuperman would be happy to discuss the merits of the issue with you. Until then, however, we are not going to put work on the topic on hold just because you don’t wish to be notified about it. Owen× ☎ 14:05, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@OwenX I’ve not refused to engage. I’ve begged to have a measured discussion about this, but instead I just log in to deletion notification after deletion notification by the dozens. Some of these articles have already survived AfD multiple times. I would love to have an actual discussion about this, but I do not feel like that’s being reciprocated. I think nominating dozens of articles at once is unfair and a strain on the system, but no one else seems bothered so I guess I’ll just watch the stack of cards fall. —Another Believer (Talk) 14:13, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m glad to see that you are already engaged in actual discussion about this, over at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television#RuPaul’s_Drag_Race_franchise_episodes_and_notability. Editors like Woodensuperman, Reywas92, MikeAllen, and Gonnym aren’t out to get you. They are hard-working contributors who are focused on quality rather than quantity. They are listening and responding to your concerns, while adhering to our notability guidelines. Work with them to reach a consensus that is in line with our P&G. Owen× ☎ 14:55, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but I am also a hard-working contributor who understands notability criteria and wants to see a path forward that’s not AFD AFD AFD AFD AFD. It does feel like select editors are out to get me, but I’m trying to understand and propose a constructive way to continue this work. —Another Believer (Talk) 15:02, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! I fully support your work on a constructive way forward. Ignore the AfDs for now. Almost anything deleted or redirected can be restored, if there’s consensus to do so. Owen× ☎ 15:08, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t plan on revisiting the AfD discussions. I find those totally unnecessary and distracting from the real conversations that should be had. —Another Believer (Talk) 15:12, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@OwenX – As the discussions seem to be heading in the right direction, in your role as admin, are you able to close the nominations I made today as withdrawn pending outcome of discussion, which looks to be heading down the draftifying route anyway. Obviously if they’ve had input from anyone else, they will need to stay open. —woodensuperman 15:24, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledging the ping. As productive discussion appears to be in progress, I don’t see any need for my further involvement here and I have nothing to add to the comment I left yesterday. Best regards… –Ad Orientem (talk) 15:39, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Woodensuperman: If you are the nominator, and no Delete views were entered, you are allowed to close your own AfD as withdrawn, per WP:NACD and WP:SK. Let me know if you need any help with that. Owen× ☎ 15:47, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, didn’t realise that, done! —woodensuperman 15:55, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Woodensuperman Are you willing to withdraw Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hun Makeover and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snatch Me Out!, too, for now, since no one else has weighed in yet? I trying to cut down the number of side discussions. —Another Believer (Talk) 17:14, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem, Gonnym, Liz, and OwenX: I took it upon myself to move all of the RPDR articles to the draft space. I then started working to improve entries, and I’ve already been successful in having multiple drafts accepted at Articles for Creation. The drafts have been accepted by different editors, so clearly there are others who think these entries have value. I am doing exactly what was asked of me, yet I’m still logging in to notification after notification of redirecting and tagging for deletion (including this article, which was recently accepted and has already survived a deletion discussion). This feels overly aggressive and unnecessary. It is so obvious to me that there are many notable episodes of the show, but one editor is going out of their way to make sure I make no progress in this area of the project. Please help. —Another Believer (Talk) 16:24, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great to see all the good work you’re doing, Another Believer!
In a collaborative project, contributors will always differ in their views. There is nothing “aggressive” in tagging or nominating a page someone believes doesn’t belong here. In the end, it’s the community, not any individual, who decide on the fate of the page. Don’t get distracted or discouraged by such actions. Work with the AfC reviewers who accepted your draft, as well as with those tagging or nominating the articles you wrote. Remember, they aren’t targeting you; they’re trying to improve the encyclopedia, just like you are.
Also, don’t focus on just one topic. I’m sure there are many articles that can benefit from your attention. Don’t turn yourself into a single-purpose editor. Owen× ☎ 17:02, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’m sorry if you’re feeling targeted. That isn’t my intention. The other articles that have been recreated and submitted through AfC seem to have something exceptional about them, they’ve won awards, etc., and I would suggest an award winning episode should usually meet any notability issues. But I’m just not seeing it with this one. There is nothing remarkable about this episode, in fact, looking at the reviews, it seems it might be a bit mediocre. WP:NEPISODE sets a pretty high bar for individual episodes. To use an example for scripted television, look at how few Friends episodes meet this standard. All I’m seeing here is WP:ROUTINE coverage, nothing that sets it apart, which is why I think we need to have the discussion. As Owen says, the community will decide, not simply me or you. —woodensuperman 17:34, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, I can move the articles about episodes that have won awards back into the main space? —Another Believer (Talk) 17:37, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, not for me to decide, probably best to continue the path agreed at with other editors at the TV project, and submit to AfC. But my personal view is that award winning episodes are likely to be notable. —woodensuperman 17:41, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sure. In the meantime, I would appreciate if you would stop making me feel like no matter what I do is wrong. I am trying to do good work here and there are other editors who see value in my efforts. I’ve expressed how your actions are making me feel and you continue to lean in hard. Please let me continue to work in peace. —Another Believer (Talk) 17:48, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Equally there are other editors who are also finding a lot of the Drag Race articles aren’t notable. It’s a collaborative project so “letting you work in peace” isn’t in the spirit of things when other editors outside of the Drag Race project are disagreeing with you. Maybe you should consider a wikibreak if you are feeling like this. —woodensuperman 17:54, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

lol ok —Another Believer (Talk) 17:55, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Another Believer,

I was just wondering, why did you empty out all of the season categories in Category:RuPaul’s Drag Race episodes? I haven’t read the collapsed message above this one but I will do so after I post this. I wish you wouldn’t collapse discussions though as it makes them difficult to read. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Some editors at WikiProject Television insisted that essentially none of the Drag Race episodes are notable. I strongly disagree but felt I had no choice but to move all of the articles to the draft space. If I hadn’t, someone else would have. I think the entire thing is completely unnecessary and uncalled for, but my requests to keep content in the main space fell on deaf ears. I know many of the episodes are notable, but I’m not going to argue with editors about it, so I’ll get back to building content. —Another Believer (Talk) 23:40, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I collapsed the above discussion in an attempt to move on. If you want the fuller picture, you’d need to review this page history to see the many AfD notifications, my requests to be left alone, and other discussions I’ve removed (again, I’m trying to move on and get back to work). Thanks —Another Believer (Talk) 00:15, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribe: Thank you so much! I’m on a mission to prove there are many notable episodes of Drag Race. “With gratitude” (yes, that’s a Drag Race reference!) 🙂 —Another Believer (Talk) 16:55, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Another Believer. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 18 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. 🙂 –❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 14:37, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gnoeee: Thank you! I love this project and think it’s needed now more than ever. Happy editing! —Another Believer (Talk) 14:41, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Squirrel Games, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:03, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon Thank you so much! —Another Believer (Talk) 17:04, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@DaniloDaysOfOurLives Wow, thank you so much! I appreciate your kind words. —Another Believer (Talk) 19:07, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What’s better than a barnstar? A turkey! Or maybe the barnstar is better. Anyway…

Thanks again! —Another Believer (Talk) 16:27, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Baffle gab1978 Thank you! —Another Believer (Talk) 16:28, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@TheInevitables Thank you so much! —Another Believer (Talk) 18:58, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries 🙂 TheInevitables (talk) 19:01, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comix: Madness
    It could happen to anyone.

Hi there, Another Believer, and thanks for all your support in this area. I have mentioned this on the WiR talk page and on Talk:Art+Feminism. You might be able to help in contacting those responsible for the project and inviting them to react. In particular, it would be useful to find the Wikipedia user names of Nina Yeboah, Bisagna Suh and Miranda Pratt. In my opinion, whatever the current politics they are facing, they deserve our support.–Ipigott (talk) 15:55, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DaniloDaysOfOurLives: Thanks so much, and happy holidays to you as well! —Another Believer (Talk) 17:08, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Monkeysmashingkeyboards Thank you so much! —Another Believer (Talk) 07:37, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Monkeysmashingkeyboards @Liz: Sorry to see the article has already been nominated for deletion. —Another Believer (Talk) 16:09, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Resolved
@Monkeysmashingkeyboards: Would you be interested in weighing in at AfD? —Another Believer (Talk) 08:48, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

👍 monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 16:04, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Born Naked (RuPaul’s Drag Race), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheInevitables (talk) 02:03, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheInevitables Thanks so much! I am pleased to see more Drag Race episode articles accepted to the main space. —Another Believer (Talk) 08:47, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Snatch Game: The Rusical, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Meena • 12:00, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Meena Thank you so much! I am pleased to see another Drag Race episode article accepted to the main space. —Another Believer (Talk) 12:01, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You’re very welcome! – Meena • 12:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m That Bitch (RuPaul’s Drag Race), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Meena • 12:13, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Meena Fantastic — Thanks again! —Another Believer (Talk) 12:14, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

10s Across the Board, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Meena • 12:14, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Happy to be making good progress in my effort to get Drag Race episode articles back into the main space. Happy editing! —Another Believer (Talk) 12:15, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Divine Inspiration (RuPaul’s Drag Race), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheInevitables (talk) 01:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheInevitables Thank you! —Another Believer (Talk) 06:36, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia New York City, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

–Warm Regards,Abhiiriya • [@píng mє] 14:45, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cptabhiiriya Thanks so much! —Another Believer (Talk) 14:54, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cariño! Ya tenemos el artículo de es:Satín Greco listo para ser traducido. :* MiguelAlanCS (talk) 14:57, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MiguelAlanCS Gracias! —Another Believer (Talk) 14:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Stub at Satín Greco. Feel free to help expand! —Another Believer (Talk) 15:04, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Pork Chop, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

mwwv converse∫edits 12:33, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mwwv Thank you so much! —Another Believer (Talk) 12:35, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Hurricane Wind and Fire Thanks so much! —Another Believer (Talk) 04:14, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Hurricane Wind and Fire Thank you! —Another Believer (Talk) 14:47, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I’ve given this guy an outline article (he already had articles in German, Italian, French, and Spanish!) but he seems to have done quite a bit of work in (or at least for) the US so I thought you might be interested. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:33, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Another Believer (Talk) 01:11, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much, and happy holidays! —Another Believer (Talk) 12:51, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The episode meets notability! Thanks for writing the article and happy holidays to you too. I am very glad to see this year come to a close, althogh I think I have said that every year since 2016. Still! We persevere. JSFarman (talk) 19:11, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Hurricane Wind and Fire Thank you! —Another Believer (Talk) 14:18, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bitch, I’m a Drag Queen!, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheInevitables (talk) 22:52, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! —Another Believer (Talk) 23:19, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! —Another Believer (Talk) 04:16, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Glamazonian Airways, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:04, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hurricane Wind and Fire Thank you! —Another Believer (Talk) 14:06, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ross Mathews vs. The Ducks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HwyNerd Mike (t | c) 16:04, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HwyNerd Mike Thanks so much! Happy editing, —Another Believer (Talk) 16:06, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ktkvtsh Thank so much! Happy holidays and happy editing, —Another Believer (Talk) 18:50, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Same to you Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:24, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! —Another Believer (Talk) 15:06, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Wicked Wiz of Oz: The Rusical!, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Htanaungg (talk) 08:49, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Htanaungg Thanks so much! —Another Believer (Talk) 14:40, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drag Queens Got Talent – Part 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Htanaungg (talk) 09:33, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! —Another Believer (Talk) 14:41, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 17:07, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you and Happy Holidays! —Another Believer (Talk) 17:26, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tap That App, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GTrang (talk) 15:15, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! —Another Believer (Talk) 15:26, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! —Another Believer (Talk) 19:15, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ShakesQueer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheInevitables (talk) 20:04, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheInevitables Thank you! —Another Believer (Talk) 20:05, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top